Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29785335›Full record

ArticleDermatology practical & conceptual2018

Raised vulvar lesions: be aware!

Fernanda S Resende, Claudio Conforti, Roberta Giuffrida, Mayara Hamilko de Barros, Iris Zalaudek

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernanda S ResendeDermatology Clinic, University of Trieste, Hospital Maggiore, Trieste, Italy.
Claudio ConfortiDermatology Clinic, University of Trieste, Hospital Maggiore, Trieste, Italy.
Roberta GiuffridaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Dermatology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Mayara Hamilko de BarrosProfessor Rubem David Azulay Institute, Charity Hospital of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Iris ZalaudekDermatology Clinic, University of Trieste, Hospital Maggiore, Trieste, Italy.
University of Trieste · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulvar melanoma is a rare and deadly cancer in women, and the prognosis is often poor. There are limited studies on the dermoscopic features of vulvar melanoma. Described criteria include the presence of blue, gray, or white colors. Herein we present the clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of a hypopigmented and heavily pigmented nodule in a 92-year-old and an 80-year-old woman. Dermoscopy in the former revealed structureless milky-red to white areas, remnants of brown pigmentation at the base and polymorphic vessels, while the latter displayed structureless blue-gray areas with black dots and peripheral lines at the base. In both cases, histopathology revealed a stage III melanoma. Our two cases along with a review of the literature suggest that the dermoscopic features described for diagnosing cutaneous nodular melanoma, apply also for vulvar melanoma. Clinicians should always raise the suspicion if observing plaques or nodules with a dermoscopic polymorphic vascular pattern and blue-black color on the genitals of postmenopausal women.

Indexed as

dermoscopyvulvar lesionsvulvar melanoma

Identifiers

PMID29785335
PMCPMC5955085
OpenAlexW2801219951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.