ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2018
Lymph node dissection during sublobar resection: why, when and how?
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for patients undergoing lung resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Survival after lobectomy versus sub-lobar resection in elderly with stage I NSCLC: a meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Radicality of mediastinal lymphadenectomy in anatomic lung resection for lung cancer: a comparative analysis of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic approaches.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- CT-based intratumoral heterogeneity quantification fusing deep learning radiomics for predicting lymph node metastasis in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The evolving role of wedge resection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Choice of wedge resection for selected T1a/bN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Is "less actually enough" when it comes to left upper division tumors?Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Strategies of Lymph Node Dissection During Sublobar Resection for Early-Stage Lung Cancer.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- The Incidence of Node-Positive Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Sublobar Resection and the Role of Radiation in Its Management.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- [Comparison of Short-term Outcomes of Lung Segmentectomy by Robotic-assisted and Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appropriate lymph node (LN) assessment is a hallmark of surgical quality of curative intent operations for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Even in the era of extensive pre-treatment work-up including routine PET-scanning and brain imaging, and selective invasive LN evaluation, unexpected LN metastases are found at surgery in more than 10% of patients with a cT1aN0 tumor. Systematic lymphadenectomy minimizes the risk of leaving tumor-LN behind and thus the risk of an incomplete resection, and provides the most truthful pTNM, which is decisive in directing adjuvant chemotherapy. Removal of interlobar, hilar, and mediastinal LNs is necessary during sublobar resection, as it is during lobectomy. In addition, segmental LNs should be dissected at both the resected and nonresected lobar segments, because the lymphatic flow from the resected segment can go directly to the neighboring segmental LNs to join the lymphatic network at the roots of the lobar bronchi, especially for tumors in anteriorly located segments. Finally, several anatomical studies described direct lymphatic vessels from the lower lobes into the upper lobar bronchi LN rendering also advisable clearance of the upper lobar LN in case of lower lobe NSCLC. Given that intralobar LN dissection is impossible within the remaining lobe after wedge resection, omission of segmental and intralobar LN retrieval may also explain the high incidence of loco-regional recurrence observed after wedge resection. Thus, segmentectomy should be preferred to wedge resection as the recommended type of sublobar resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.