The Efficacy of a Ceramide-based Cream in Mild-to-moderate Atopic Dermatitis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

1. A Split-Face Micro-Needling Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Consumer Perception of a Novel Moisturization Agent.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025
   Trial
2. A daily regimen of a ceramide-dominant moisturizing cream and cleanser restores the skin permeability barrier in adults with moderate eczema: A randomized trial.Dermatologic therapy · 2021
   Trial
3. Efficacy of Topical Application of a Skin Moisturizer Containing Pseudo-Ceramide and a Eucalyptus Leaf Extract on Atopic Dermatitis: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
   Review
4. The Pathogenic and Therapeutic Implications of Ceramide Abnormalities in Atopic Dermatitis.Cells · 2021
   Review
5. The efficacy of synthetic pseudo-ceramide for dry and rough lips.International journal of cosmetic science · 2021
   Article
6. Breaking the Itch-Scratch Cycle: Topical Options for the Management of Chronic Cutaneous Itch in Atopic Dermatitis.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
   Review
7. Adverse Events from Emollient Use in Eczema: A Restricted Review of Published Data.Dermatology and therapy · 2019
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as