Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29785203›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2018

Conflict and tuberculosis in Sudan: a 10-year review of the National Tuberculosis Programme, 2004-2014.

Sara A Hassanain, Jeffrey K Edwards, Emilie Venables, Engy Ali, Khadiga Adam, Hafiz Hussien, Asma Elsony

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring Challenges to COVID-19 Vaccination in the Darfur Region of Sudan.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Isoniazid acetylation phenotypes in the Sudanese population; findings and implications.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara A HassanainThe Epidemiological Laboratory, House 34, Street 53, New Extension, P.O.BOX 13595, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0001-7095-3489
Jeffrey K EdwardsMédecins Sans Frontières, Luxembourg Operational Research Unit (LuxOR), Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
Emilie VenablesMédecins Sans Frontières, Luxembourg Operational Research Unit (LuxOR), Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
Engy AliMédecins Sans Frontières, Luxembourg Operational Research Unit (LuxOR), Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
Khadiga Adam5Directorate General of Planning and International Health - Health Information Federal Ministry of Health-Sudan, Khartoum, Sudan.
Hafiz HussienThe Epidemiological Laboratory, House 34, Street 53, New Extension, P.O.BOX 13595, Khartoum, Sudan.
Asma ElsonyThe Epidemiological Laboratory, House 34, Street 53, New Extension, P.O.BOX 13595, Khartoum, Sudan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSudan is a fragile developing country, with a low expenditure on health. It has been subjected to ongoing conflicts ever since 1956, with the Darfur crisis peaking in 2004. The conflict, in combination with the weak infrastructure, can lead to poor access to healthcare. Hence, this can cause an increased risk of infection, greater morbidity and mortality from tuberculosis (TB), especially amongst the poor, displaced and refugee populations. This study will be the first to describe TB case notifications, characteristics and outcomes over a ten-year period in Darfur in comparison with the non-conflict Eastern zones within Sudan.

methodsA cross-sectional review of the National Tuberculosis Programme (NTP) data from 2004 to 2014 comparing the Darfur conflict zone with the non-conflict eastern zone.

resultsNew case notifications were 52% lower in the conflict zone (21,131) compared to the non-conflict zone (43,826). Smear-positive pulmonary TB (PTB) in the conflict zone constituted 63% of all notified cases, compared to the non-conflict zone of 32% (

conclusionA low TB case notification was found in the conflict zone from 2004 to 2014. High loss to follow up and falling treatment success rates were found in both conflict and non-conflict zones, which represents a significant public health risk. Further analysis of the TB response and surveillance system in both zones is needed to confirm the factors associated with the poor outcomes. Using context-sensitive measures and simplified pathways with an emphasis on displaced persons may increase access and case notification in conflict zones, which can help avoid a loss to follow up in both zones.

Indexed as

ConflictDarfurNon-conflictOperational researchOutcomesPerformanceSudanTuberculosis programme

Identifiers

PMID29785203
PMCPMC5954449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.