ArticleHereditas2018
Characterization of new microsatellite markers based on the transcriptome sequencing of
Article in Hereditas, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research Progress on Molecular Breeding and Application ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- First3 Biotech · 2025Article
- Transcriptome, miRNA, and degradome sequencing reveal the leaf stripe (Pyrenophora graminea) resistance genes in Tibetan hulless barley.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- A NovelCurrent genomics · 2025Article
- Transcriptome sequencing and screening of genes related to the MADS-box gene family in Clematis courtoisii.PloS one · 2024Article
- Development of SSR molecular markers and genetic diversity analysis of Clematis acerifolia from Taihang Mountains.PloS one · 2023Article
- Comparative transcriptome analysis of heat stress responses of Clematis lanuginosa and Clematis crassifolia.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Physiological and Gene Expression Changes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- First de novo genome specific development, characterization and validation of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers in Genus Salvadora.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Pharmaceutical resource discovery from traditional medicinal plants: Pharmacophylogeny and pharmacophylogenomics.Chinese herbal medicines · 2020Review
- Genetic Divergence and Relationship AmongFrontiers in genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
resultsSequences on a total of 71,900 high-quality unigenes with the mean length of 865 bp were produced in this study. There were 6192unigenes annotated and classified into 49 functional sub-groups in three main ontology categories in GO (Gen Ontology) database,14,022 unigenes mapped to COGs (Clusters of Orthologous Groups) database and classified into 25 functional categories, and 21,494 unigenes obtained and divided into 128 pathways of KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes) Database. A total of 7532 SSRs were discovered from 6337 unigenes. We randomly tested 210 primer pairs, of which 52 primer pairs were able to generate specific products, and 19 possessed polymorphism in the 13 wild populations of six species from
conclusionsThe dataset of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.