Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29785093›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2018

Assessment of patients' warfarin knowledge and anticoagulation control at a joint physician- and pharmacist-managed clinic in China.

Xingang Li, Shusen Sun, Qiaoyu Wang, Buxing Chen, Zhigang Zhao, Xiaowei Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ambulatory care pharmacy practice in China: status and future efforts.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020
    Review
  15. Knowledge, Adherence, and Satisfaction With Warfarin Therapy and Associated Factors Among Outpatients at University Teaching Hospital in Ethiopia.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xingang LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Shusen SunCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA.
Qiaoyu WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Buxing ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhigang ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaowei XuDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWarfarin is a widely used anticoagulant with a narrow therapeutic index, and it requires close monitoring and adequate patient education. We aimed to assess the knowledge level regarding warfarin therapy among its users and to identify the factors that significantly influence anticoagulation control. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients attending the Warfarin Clinic at the Beijing Tiantan Hospital were enrolled in this study. Patients' knowledge on warfarin was assessed using a validated Anticoagulation Knowledge Assessment (AKA) questionnaire. Patients' responses to each question were analyzed to identify areas of improvement in current warfarin education. International normalized ratio (INR) control was defined by the time in therapeutic range (TTR) calculated using the Rosendaal method. Spearman correlation analysis was used to investigate the association between TTR and the independent variables.

resultsA total of 65 patients were enrolled in this study. Eleven questions were answered correctly by <50% of the patients. A total of 858 INR results were recorded; 432 INR values (50.3%) reached the predefined goals, and the mean TTR was 49.8%±24.8%. There were significant associations between TTR and patients' AKA scores (

conclusionAreas for improvement in patient education have been identified, and processes for educational modification are currently in development.

Indexed as

educational levelInternational normalized ratioPeople’s Republic of China

Identifiers

PMID29785093
PMCPMC5953313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.