Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29784798›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Stabilized single-injection inactivated polio vaccine elicits a strong neutralizing immune response.

Stephany Y Tzeng, Kevin J McHugh, Adam M Behrens, Sviatlana Rose, James L Sugarman, Shiran Ferber, Robert Langer, Ana Jaklenec

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Controlling timing and location in vaccines.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Recent advancements in single dose slow-release devices for prophylactic vaccines.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Decisive Conditions for Strategic Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Engineered drug delivery devices to address Global Health challenges.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephany Y TzengDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Kevin J McHughDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Adam M BehrensDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Sviatlana RoseDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
James L SugarmanDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Shiran FerberDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Robert LangerDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; rlanger@mit.edu jaklenec@mit.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4255-0492
Ana JaklenecDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; rlanger@mit.edu jaklenec@mit.edu.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination in the developing world is hampered by limited patient access, which prevents individuals from receiving the multiple injections necessary for protective immunity. Here, we developed an injectable microparticle formulation of the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) that releases multiple pulses of stable antigen over time. To accomplish this, we established an IPV stabilization strategy using cationic polymers for pH modulation to enhance traditional small-molecule-based stabilization methods. We investigated the mechanism of this strategy and showed that it was broadly applicable to all three antigens in IPV. Our lead formulations released two bursts of IPV 1 month apart, mimicking a typical vaccination schedule in the developing world. One injection of the controlled-release formulations elicited a similar or better neutralizing response in rats, considered the correlate of protection in humans, than multiple injections of liquid vaccine. This single-administration vaccine strategy has the potential to improve vaccine coverage in the developing world.

Indexed as

Immunization ScheduleAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansInjectionsMicrospheresPoliomyelitisPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedRatsRats, WistarVaccinationPoliovirus Vaccine, Inactivatedcontrolled releaseglobal healthinactivated polio vaccinesingle-administration vaccinesvaccine stability

Identifiers

PMID29784798
PMCPMC6003376
OpenAlexW2803668997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.