Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29784082›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Novel transgenic pigs with enhanced growth and reduced environmental impact.

Xianwei Zhang, Zicong Li, Huaqiang Yang, Dewu Liu, Gengyuan Cai, Guoling Li, Jianxin Mo, Dehua Wang, Cuili Zhong, Haoqiang Wang and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Molecular breeding of pigs in the genome editing era.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Effects of partial replacement of soybean meal withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Improvements in pig agriculture through gene editing.CABI agriculture and bioscience · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Xianwei Zhang *College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6205-3050
Zicong Li *College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6997-4669
Huaqiang YangCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4287-0026
Dewu LiuCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Gengyuan CaiCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Guoling LiCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianxin MoCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Dehua WangCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Cuili ZhongCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Haoqiang WangCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Yue SunCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Junsong ShiNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Wens Foodstuff Group Co., Ltd, Yunfu, China.
Enqin ZhengCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Fanming MengCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Mao ZhangCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyan HeCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Rong ZhouNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Wens Foodstuff Group Co., Ltd, Yunfu, China.
Jian ZhangNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Wens Foodstuff Group Co., Ltd, Yunfu, China.
Miaorong HuangCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Ran ZhangCollege of Biological Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Ning LiCollege of Biological Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Mingzhe FanDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Jinzeng YangDepartment of Human Nutrition, Food and Animal Sciences, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, United States.
Zhenfang WuCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5586-6771
South China Agricultural University · CNWen's Food Group (China) · CNChina Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Guelph · CAUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In pig production, inefficient feed digestion causes excessive nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen to be released to the environment. To address the issue of environmental emissions, we established transgenic pigs harboring a single-copy quad-cistronic transgene and simultaneously expressing three microbial enzymes, β-glucanase, xylanase, and phytase in the salivary glands. All the transgenic enzymes were successfully expressed, and the digestion of non-starch polysaccharides (NSPs) and phytate in the feedstuff was enhanced. Fecal nitrogen and phosphorus outputs in the transgenic pigs were reduced by 23.2-45.8%, and growth rate improved by 23.0% (gilts) and 24.4% (boars) compared with that of age-matched wild-type littermates under the same dietary treatment. The transgenic pigs showed an 11.5-14.5% improvement in feed conversion rate compared with the wild-type pigs. These findings indicate that the transgenic pigs are promising resources for improving feed efficiency and reducing environmental impact.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimals, Genetically ModifiedEnvironmentSwine6-PhytaseAnimalsCarbohydrate MetabolismFecesGlycoside HydrolasesNitrogenPhosphorusRecombinant ProteinsSalivary Glands6-PhytaseGlycoside HydrolasesNitrogenPhosphorusRecombinant Proteinsbiochemistrychemical biologyinfectious diseasemicrobiologyNitrogenNonstarch polysaccharidesPhosphorusSalivary glandsTransgenic pigs

Identifiers

PMID29784082
PMCPMC5963925
OpenAlexW2804177666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.