Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29784074›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2018

Effects of Fenbendazole-impregnated Feed and Topical Moxidectin during Quarantine on the Gut Microbiota of C57BL/6 Mice.

Scott W Korte, Craig L Franklin, Rebecca A Dorfmeyer, Aaron C Ericsson

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Virulence · 2026
    Article
  2. Influence of Water Delivery Method on the Gut Microbiome in Laboratory Mice (Mus musculus).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis onComparative medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott W KorteOffice of Animal Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Craig L FranklinMetagenomics Center, Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Rebecca A DorfmeyerMutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Aaron C EricssonMetagenomics Center, Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri;, Email: ericssona@missouri.edu.
University of Missouri · US

Funding

The Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center at the University of Missouri - ResourceU42OD010918 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI James Amos-Landgraf · 2012 to 2026
$25.1M
NIH HHS U42 OD010918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To protect the biosecurity of research rodent colonies, research institutions frequently require a quarantine period for live animals transferred into their facilities. Quarantine practices often include antibiotic and antiparasitic treatment with drugs such as fenbendazole and macrolide lactones. The influence of these compounds on the resident gut microbiota of mice is unknown, and any effects might subsequently affect model reproducibility. To test the influence of standard quarantine procedures on the composition of the microbiota, C57BL/6 mice, purchased from 2 different commercial suppliers, were randomly assigned to treatment groups (n = 12) by vendor and treated with fenbendazole-supplemented feed, topical moxidectin, both treatments, or no treatment (control), according to our institution's standard treatment regimen and duration. Feces were collected on arrival, immediately after completing the 8-wk treatment, and at 2 and 4 wk after treatment. Fecal DNA was extracted, sequenced, and analyzed to compare the changes in the microbiota of treated and control groups. Although significant main effects of time and treatment and interactions between those variables were detected in comparisons of richness, α-diversity, and β-diversity, the effect sizes associated with any particular treatment were consistently much smaller than that associated with acclimation to a new facility in the absence of any quarantine treatments. This outcome, along with the visual evaluation of principal coordinate analysis based on multiple similarity indices, suggests that time or institution plays a larger role in alterations of the murine gut microbiota than do quarantine treatments on its composition.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimal FeedAnimalsAntinematodal AgentsFecesFenbendazoleFood, FortifiedGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLaboratory Animal ScienceMacrolidesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrobiotaQuarantineRandom AllocationReproducibility of ResultsAntinematodal AgentsFenbendazoleMacrolidesmoxidectin

Identifiers

PMID29784074
PMCPMC5966229
OpenAlexW2980214301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.