ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2018
Automated extraction of Biomarker information from pathology reports.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural Language Processing Methods Automate Molecular Marker Extraction From Glioma Pathology Reports.Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Article
- ImpACT Project: Improving Access to Clinical Trials in Victoria, an Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- A Question-and-Answer System to Extract Data From Free-Text Oncological Pathology Reports (CancerBERT Network): Development Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Searching Full-Text Anatomic Pathology Reports Using Business Intelligence Software.Journal of pathology informatics · 2022Article
- Automatic Classification of Cancer Pathology Reports: A Systematic Review.Journal of pathology informatics · 2022Article
- An accessible, efficient, and accurate natural language processing method for extracting diagnostic data from pathology reports.Journal of pathology informatics · 2022Article
- PathologyBERT - Pre-trained Vs. A New Transformer Language Model for Pathology Domain.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022Article
- Limitations of Transformers on Clinical Text Classification.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2021Article
- Validation of deep learning natural language processing algorithm for keyword extraction from pathology reports in electronic health records.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A frame semantic overview of NLP-based information extraction for cancer-related EHR notes.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2019Review
- Clinical Data Extraction and Normalization of Cyrillic Electronic Health Records Via Deep-Learning Natural Language Processing.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2019Article
- Structuring and centralizing breast cancer real-world biomarker data from pathology reports through C-LABDigital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPathology reports are written in free-text form, which precludes efficient data gathering. We aimed to overcome this limitation and design an automated system for extracting biomarker profiles from accumulated pathology reports.
methodsWe designed a new data model for representing biomarker knowledge. The automated system parses immunohistochemistry reports based on a "slide paragraph" unit defined as a set of immunohistochemistry findings obtained for the same tissue slide. Pathology reports are parsed using context-free grammar for immunohistochemistry, and using a tree-like structure for surgical pathology. The performance of the approach was validated on manually annotated pathology reports of 100 randomly selected patients managed at Seoul National University Hospital.
resultsHigh F-scores were obtained for parsing biomarker name and corresponding test results (0.999 and 0.998, respectively) from the immunohistochemistry reports, compared to relatively poor performance for parsing surgical pathology findings. However, applying the proposed approach to our single-center dataset revealed information on 221 unique biomarkers, which represents a richer result than biomarker profiles obtained based on the published literature. Owing to the data representation model, the proposed approach can associate biomarker profiles extracted from an immunohistochemistry report with corresponding pathology findings listed in one or more surgical pathology reports. Term variations are resolved by normalization to corresponding preferred terms determined by expanded dictionary look-up and text similarity-based search.
conclusionsOur proposed approach for biomarker data extraction addresses key limitations regarding data representation and can handle reports prepared in the clinical setting, which often contain incomplete sentences, typographical errors, and inconsistent formatting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.