Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29783974›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

Pathways to prevention: protocol for the CAP (Climate and Preventure) study to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of school-based universal, selective and combined alcohol misuse prevention into early adulthood.

Nicola C Newton, Lexine Stapinski, Tim Slade, Katrina E Champion, Emma L Barrett, Catherine Chapman, Anna Smout, Siobhan Lawler, Marius Mather, Natalie Castellanos-Ryan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Co-design of digital public health substance use resources: A collaboration between young people and experts.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicola C NewtonNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use (CREMS) National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. n.newton@unsw.edu.au.
Lexine StapinskiNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use (CREMS) National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Tim SladeNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use (CREMS) National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Katrina E ChampionNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use (CREMS) National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Emma L BarrettNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use (CREMS) National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Catherine ChapmanNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use (CREMS) National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Anna SmoutNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use (CREMS) National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Siobhan LawlerNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use (CREMS) National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Marius MatherNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use (CREMS) National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Natalie Castellanos-RyanUniversity of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Patricia J ConrodUniversity of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Maree TeessonNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use (CREMS) National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
National Health and Medical Research Council · AUUNSW Sydney · AUUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlcohol use and associated harms are among the leading causes of burden of disease among young people, highlighting the need for effective prevention. The Climate and Preventure (CAP) study was the first trial of a combined universal and selective school-based approach to preventing alcohol misuse among adolescents. Initial results indicate that universal, selective and combined prevention were all effective in delaying the uptake of alcohol use and binge drinking for up to 3 years following the interventions. However, little is known about the sustainability of prevention effects across the transition to early adulthood, a period of increased exposure to alcohol and other drug use. This paper describes the protocol for the CAP long-term follow-up study which will determine the effectiveness of universal, selective and combined alcohol misuse prevention up to 7 years post intervention, and across the transition from adolescence into early adulthood.

methodsA cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted between 2012 and 2015 with 2190 students (mean age: 13.3 yrs) from 26 Australian high schools. Participants were randomized to receive one of four conditions; universal prevention for all students (Climate); selective prevention for high-risk students (Preventure); combined universal and selective prevention (Climate and Preventure; CAP); or health education as usual (Control). The positive effect of the interventions on alcohol use at 12-, 24- and 36-month post baseline have previously been reported. This study will follow up the CAP study cohort approximately 5- and 7-years post baseline. The primary outcome will be alcohol use and related harms. Secondary outcomes will be cannabis use, alcohol and other drug harms including violent behavior, and mental health symptomatology. Analyses will be conducted using multi-level, mixed effects models within an intention-to-treat framework. DISCUSSION: This study will provide the first ever evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of combining universal and selective approaches to alcohol prevention and will examine the durability of intervention effects into the longer-term, over a 7-year period from adolescence to early adulthood.

trial registrationThis trial was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12612000026820 ) on January 6th 2012.

Indexed as

School Health ServicesAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingAustraliaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth EducationHumansMaleProgram EvaluationResearch DesignStudentsAlcoholCombinedPersonalityPreventionSchoolSelectiveUniversal

Identifiers

PMID29783974
PMCPMC5963131
OpenAlexW2805045916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.