Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29783968›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2018

Investigating porcine parvoviruses genogroup 2 infection using in situ polymerase chain reaction.

Dinko Novosel, Daniel Cadar, Tamás Tuboly, Andreja Jungic, Tomasz Stadejek, Tahar Ait-Ali, Attila Cságola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Dinko NovoselDepartment of Pathology, Croatian Veterinary Institute, Savska cesta 143, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. dinko.novosel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2602-8696
Daniel CadarWHO Collaborating Centre for Arbovirus and Haemorrhagic Fever Reference and Research, National Reference Centre for Tropical Infectious Diseases, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Bernhard-Nocht-Strasse 74, 20359, Hamburg, Germany.
Tamás TubolyDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Immunology, Szent István University, István u. 2, Budapest, 1078, Hungary.
Andreja JungicDepartment for Virology, Croatian Veterinary Institute, Savska cesta 143, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tomasz StadejekDepartment of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Science, Nowoursynowska 159C, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.
Tahar Ait-AliThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Edingburgh, United Kingdom.
Attila CságolaDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Immunology, Szent István University, István u. 2, Budapest, 1078, Hungary.
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem · HUCroatian Veterinary Institute · HRRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of Zagreb · HRWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme grants BB/J004227/1BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme grants BB/P013740/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPorcine parvovirus 2 (PPV2) was detected in swine serum without showing any relationship with disease. The emergence of the virus seemed to be a unique event until other genetically highly similar parvoviruses were identified in China and, later in 2012, the presence of the virus was also described in Europe. PPV2 is widely distributed in pig populations where it is suspected to be involved in respiratory conditions, based on its frequent detection in lung samples. In order to investigate the potential pathogenic involvement of PPV2, 60 dead pigs were examined from two farms. They were necropsied and tested for PPV2 and PCV2 (Porcine circovirus type 2) by PCR; by Brown and Brenn (B&B) staining for bacteria; by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect CD3, Swine leukocyte antigen class II DQ (SLAIIDQ), lysozyme, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), swine influenza (SIV), Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhyo); and by in situ hybridization (ISH) to detect ssDNA and dsDNA of PCV2. PPV2 positive samples were subjected to in situ polymerase chain reaction (IS-PCR) including double staining method to detect PPV2 and host cell markers. To calculate statistical difference we used GENMOD or LOGISTIC procedures in Statistical Analysis System (SAS®).

resultsWe found that the PPV2 was localized mostly in lymphocytes in lungs, lymph nodes and liver. Neither CD3 antigen nor lysozyme was expressed by these infected cells. In contrast, low levels of SLAIIDQ were expressed by infected cells, suggesting that PPV2 may have a specific tropism for immature B lymphocytes and/or NK lymphocytes though possibly not T lymphocytes.

conclusionThe overall conclusion of this study indicates that PPV2 may contribute to the pathogenesis of pneumonia.

Indexed as

AnimalsParvoviridae InfectionsParvovirus, PorcineReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSwineSwine DiseasesIn situ PCRLungsLymphocytesPPV2

Identifiers

PMID29783968
PMCPMC5963090
OpenAlexW2805919856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.