Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29783948›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Expansion of the SOS regulon of Vibrio cholerae through extensive transcriptome analysis and experimental validation.

Evelyne Krin, Sebastian Aguilar Pierlé, Odile Sismeiro, Bernd Jagla, Marie-Agnès Dillies, Hugo Varet, Oihane Irazoki, Susana Campoy, Zoé Rouy, Stéphane Cruveiller and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. mBio · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Evelyne KrinDépartement Génomes et Génétique, Institut Pasteur, Unité de Plasticité du Génome Bactérien, Paris, France.
Sebastian Aguilar PierléDépartement Génomes et Génétique, Institut Pasteur, Unité de Plasticité du Génome Bactérien, Paris, France.
Odile SismeiroInstitut Pasteur, Transcriptome and EpiGenome, Biomics Center for Innovation and Technological Research, Paris, France.
Bernd JaglaInstitut Pasteur, Transcriptome and EpiGenome, Biomics Center for Innovation and Technological Research, Paris, France.
Marie-Agnès DilliesInstitut Pasteur, Transcriptome and EpiGenome, Biomics Center for Innovation and Technological Research, Paris, France.
Hugo VaretInstitut Pasteur, Transcriptome and EpiGenome, Biomics Center for Innovation and Technological Research, Paris, France.
Oihane IrazokiDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Bellaterra, Spain.
Susana CampoyDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Bellaterra, Spain.
Zoé RouyUMR 8030, CNRS, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob - Genoscope, Laboratoire d'Analyses Bioinformatiques pour la Génomique et le Métabolisme, Université Evry-Val-d'Essonne, Evry, France.
Stéphane CruveillerUMR 8030, CNRS, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob - Genoscope, Laboratoire d'Analyses Bioinformatiques pour la Génomique et le Métabolisme, Université Evry-Val-d'Essonne, Evry, France.
Claudine MédigueUMR 8030, CNRS, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob - Genoscope, Laboratoire d'Analyses Bioinformatiques pour la Génomique et le Métabolisme, Université Evry-Val-d'Essonne, Evry, France.
Jean-Yves CoppéeInstitut Pasteur, Transcriptome and EpiGenome, Biomics Center for Innovation and Technological Research, Paris, France.
Didier MazelDépartement Génomes et Génétique, Institut Pasteur, Unité de Plasticité du Génome Bactérien, Paris, France. mazel@pasteur.fr.
Institut Pasteur · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SOS response is an almost ubiquitous response of cells to genotoxic stresses. The full complement of genes in the SOS regulon for Vibrio species has only been addressed through bioinformatic analyses predicting LexA binding box consensus and in vitro validation. Here, we perform whole transcriptome sequencing from Vibrio cholerae treated with mitomycin C as an SOS inducer to characterize the SOS regulon and other pathways affected by this treatment.

resultsComprehensive transcriptional profiling allowed us to define the full landscape of promoters and transcripts active in V. cholerae. We performed extensive transcription start site (TSS) mapping as well as detection/quantification of the coding and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) repertoire in strain N16961. To improve TSS detection, we developed a new technique to treat RNA extracted from cells grown in various conditions. This allowed for identification of 3078 TSSs with an average 5'UTR of 116 nucleotides, and peak distribution between 16 and 64 nucleotides; as well as 629 ncRNAs. Mitomycin C treatment induced transcription of 737 genes and 28 ncRNAs at least 2 fold, while it repressed 231 genes and 17 ncRNAs. Data analysis revealed that in addition to the core genes known to integrate the SOS regulon, several metabolic pathways were induced. This study allowed for expansion of the Vibrio SOS regulon, as twelve genes (ubiEJB, tatABC, smpA, cep, VC0091, VC1190, VC1369-1370) were found to be co-induced with their adjacent canonical SOS regulon gene(s), through transcriptional read-through. Characterization of UV and mitomycin C susceptibility for mutants of these newly identified SOS regulon genes and other highly induced genes and ncRNAs confirmed their role in DNA damage rescue and protection.

conclusionsWe show that genotoxic stress induces a pervasive transcriptional response, affecting almost 20% of the V. cholerae genes. We also demonstrate that the SOS regulon is larger than previously known, and its syntenic organization is conserved among Vibrio species. Furthermore, this specific co-localization is found in other γ-proteobacteria for genes recN-smpA and rmuC-tatABC, suggesting SOS regulon conservation in this phylum. Finally, we comment on the limitations of widespread NGS approaches for identification of all RNA species in bacteria.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Profiling5' Untranslated RegionsMitomycinPhenotypeRegulonSOS Response, GeneticsTranscription Initiation SiteVibrio cholerae5' Untranslated RegionsMitomycinDNA repairncRNAnrdAnrdBSOS responseTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID29783948
PMCPMC5963079
OpenAlexW2804183533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.