Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29783718›Full record

ReviewHigh-throughput2018

Functional Genomics Approaches to Studying Symbioses between Legumes and Nitrogen-Fixing Rhizobia.

Martina Lardi, Gabriella Pessi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in High-throughput, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  5. A Look at Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Nitrogen fixation in maize: breeding opportunities.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Review
  9. Cells · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Expanding the Regulon of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martina LardiDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland. martina.lardi@uzh.ch.
Gabriella PessiDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland. gabriella.pessi@botinst.uzh.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-8138-5541

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological nitrogen fixation gives legumes a pronounced growth advantage in nitrogen-deprived soils and is of considerable ecological and economic interest. In exchange for reduced atmospheric nitrogen, typically given to the plant in the form of amides or ureides, the legume provides nitrogen-fixing rhizobia with nutrients and highly specialised root structures called nodules. To elucidate the molecular basis underlying physiological adaptations on a genome-wide scale, functional genomics approaches, such as transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, have been used. This review presents an overview of the different functional genomics approaches that have been performed on rhizobial symbiosis, with a focus on studies investigating the molecular mechanisms used by the bacterial partner to interact with the legume. While rhizobia belonging to the alpha-proteobacterial group (alpha-rhizobia) have been well studied, few studies to date have investigated this process in beta-proteobacteria (beta-rhizobia).

Indexed as

alpha-rhizobiabeta-rhizobiaflavonoidsmetabolomicsproteomicsroot exudatesroot nodulesymbiosistranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID29783718
PMCPMC6023288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.