Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29783671›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Views and Experiences of Persons with Chronic Diseases about Strategies that Aim to Integrate and Re-Integrate Them into Work: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.

Eva Esteban, Michaela Coenen, Elizabeth Ito, Sonja Gruber, Chiara Scaratti, Matilde Leonardi, Olga Roka, Evdokia Vasilou, Amalia Muñoz-Murillo, Carolina C Ávila and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Current Practice of Gradual Return to Work in Germany: A Qualitative Study Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Eva EstebanDepartment of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair for Public Health and Health Services Research, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany. eva.esteban@med.lmu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9084-1131
Michaela CoenenDepartment of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair for Public Health and Health Services Research, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany. michaela.coenen@med.lmu.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7492-7907
Elizabeth ItoDepartment of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair for Public Health and Health Services Research, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany. elizabeth.ito.88@gmail.com.
Sonja GruberDisability and Diversity Studies, Carinthia University of Applied Science (CUAS), 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria. s.gruber@fh-kaernten.at.
Chiara ScarattiNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Neurological Institute Carlo Besta IRCCS Foundation, 20133 Milan, Italy. chiara.scaratti@istituto-besta.it.
Matilde LeonardiNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Neurological Institute Carlo Besta IRCCS Foundation, 20133 Milan, Italy. matilde.leonardi@istituto-besta.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0552-8923
Olga RokaDepartment of Special Education, University of Thessaly, 38221 Volos, Greece. olgaroc1@yahoo.gr.
Evdokia VasilouDepartment of Special Education, University of Thessaly, 38221 Volos, Greece. eudokia1@hotmail.com.
Amalia Muñoz-MurilloResearch Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Sant Boi de Llobregat, 08830 Barcelona, Spain. a.munoz@pssjd.org.
Carolina C ÁvilaDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and Institute of Health Carlos III, CIBER of Mental Health (CIBERSAM), 28038 Madrid, Spain. carolina_avila@hotmail.com.
Dare S KovačičDevelopment Center for Vocational Rehabilitation, University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. dare.kovacic@ir-rs.si.
Ivana IvandicDepartment of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair for Public Health and Health Services Research, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany. ivana.ivandic@med.lmu.de.
Carla SabariegoDepartment of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair for Public Health and Health Services Research, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany. carla.sabariego@med.lmu.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6946-0177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of strategies targeting professional integration and reintegration strongly depends on the experiences of participants. The aim of this systematic literature review is to synthesize European qualitative studies exploring views and experiences of persons with chronic conditions regarding strategies for integration and reintegration into work. The systematic search was conducted in Medline, PsycINFO, CDR-HTA, CDR-DARE and Cochrane Systematic Reviews. Overall, 24 studies published in English between January 2011 and April 2016 were included. Most studies were carried out in Nordic countries or in the UK, and most participants were persons with either mental or musculoskeletal disorders. Ten themes emerged: individual and holistic approach, clarity of strategy and processes, timing of rehabilitation processes, experience with professionals, at the workplace and with peer groups, changes in the understanding of health and work, active involvement in the process, competencies development and motivating aspects of work. Findings highlight, among others, the need to actively involve participants in the return to work process and to provide timely and clearly structured processes and interventions. This review provides stakeholders key information to develop, plan, implement and evaluate interventions to integrate and re-integrate persons with chronic conditions into work in Europe.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseEuropeHumansQualitative ResearchReturn to Workchronic diseaseemploymentqualitative studiessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29783671
PMCPMC5982061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.