Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29783647›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Type and Location of Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Falls during Static and Dynamic Tasks in Healthy Elderly: A Review.

Rosaria Rucco, Antonietta Sorriso, Marianna Liparoti, Giampaolo Ferraioli, Pierpaolo Sorrentino, Michele Ambrosanio, Fabio Baselice

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rosaria RuccoDepartment of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", 80133 Naples, Italy. rosaria.rucco@uniparthenope.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0943-131X
Antonietta SorrisoDepartment of Engineering, University of Naples "Parthenope", 80133 Naples, Italy. antonietta.sorriso@uniparthenope.it.
Marianna LiparotiDepartment of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", 80133 Naples, Italy. marianna.liparoti@uniparthenope.it.
Giampaolo FerraioliDepartment of Science and Technologies, University of Naples "Parthenope", 80133 Naples, Italy. giampaolo.ferraioli@uniparthenope.it.
Pierpaolo SorrentinoIDC Hermitage Capodimonte, 80133 Naples, Italy. pierpaolo.sorrentino@uniparthenope.it.
Michele AmbrosanioDepartment of Engineering, University of Naples "Parthenope", 80133 Naples, Italy. michele.ambrosanio@uniparthenope.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3669-8183
Fabio BaseliceDepartment of Engineering, University of Naples "Parthenope", 80133 Naples, Italy. fabio.baselice@uniparthenope.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5964-8667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the meaning of successful living has moved from extending lifetime to improving the quality of aging, mainly in terms of high cognitive and physical functioning together with avoiding diseases. In healthy elderly, falls represent an alarming accident both in terms of number of events and the consequent decrease in the quality of life. Stability control is a key approach for studying the genesis of falls, for detecting the event and trying to develop methodologies to prevent it. Wearable sensors have proved to be very useful in monitoring and analyzing the stability of subjects. Within this manuscript, a review of the approaches proposed in the literature for fall risk assessment, fall prevention and fall detection in healthy elderly is provided. The review has been carried out by using the most adopted publication databases and by defining a search strategy based on keywords and boolean algebra constructs. The analysis aims at evaluating the state of the art of such kind of monitoring, both in terms of most adopted sensor technologies and of their location on the human body. The review has been extended to both dynamic and static analyses. In order to provide a useful tool for researchers involved in this field, the manuscript also focuses on the tests conducted in the analyzed studies, mainly in terms of characteristics of the population involved and of the tasks used. Finally, the main trends related to sensor typology, sensor location and tasks have been identified.

Indexed as

Monitoring, PhysiologicWearable Electronic DevicesAccidental FallsAgedBiosensing TechniquesHumansMonitoring, Ambulatoryfall detectionfall preventionfall risk assessmentfalls in healthy elderlywearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID29783647
PMCPMC5982638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.