Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29783088›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2018

Evaluation of genotoxicity and mutagenic effects of vector/DNA nanocomplexes in transfected mesenchymal stem cells by flow cytometry.

Alireza Nomani, Xuguang Chen, Arash Hatefi

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alireza NomaniDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States.
Xuguang ChenDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States.
Arash HatefiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, United States. Electronic address: ahatefi@pharmacy.rutgers.edu.

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Chang S Chan · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
A Nanotechnology Platform for Suicide Gene Therapy of Recurring Ovarian CancerR01CA175318 · NCI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI HATEFI, ARASH · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Bioengineering a Safe and Efficient Vector Technology for Stem Cell TransfectionR21EB016792 · NIBIB · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI HATEFI, ARASH · 2014 to 2015
$426k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175318NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB016792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a great deal of interest in ex-vivo genetic modification of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to meet various biomedical needs. Considering the self-renewal potential of MSCs, it is critically important to ensure that transfection vectors (gene carriers) do not induce genotoxicity because they could theoretically turn a single stem cell into a cancer-initiating cell. Unfortunately, there is currently no reliable, unbiased, and quantitative method to measure genotoxicity (micronuclei formation) of gene carriers directly in transfected MSCs. Consequently, it has not been possible to study the correlation of vectors' physicochemical characteristics with their impact on stem cell genome stability. To address this deficiency, a flow cytometry-based method with a specialized gating protocol was developed that not only measures micronuclei formation, but also determines the mechanism of mutagenesis (i.e., clastogenic vs. aneugenic) of each vector in transfected MSCs. This gating protocol effectively eliminates all interfering signals associated with aggregated nanoparticles (viral and non-viral), exogenous DNA, and apoptotic/necrotic bodies from the micronuclei measurement process. The presented gating protocol for flow cytometry, which is provided as a template, enables investigators in academia, industry and regulatory bodies to rapidly and reliably evaluate the genosafety profiles of gene carriers. The findings of this study also indicate that highly positively charged lipid- and polymeric-based vectors can induce genotoxicity even without manifesting substantial somatic toxicity. Thus, extreme care must be taken before implanting ex-vivo-modified MSCs back into a patient's body. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: There is a great interest in genetic modification of stem cells (SCs) by using vectors for various biomedical needs. Considering the self-renewal potential of SCs, it is essential to ensure that such vectors do not induce genetic aberrations (genotoxicity) because they could theoretically turn a single stem cell into a cancer-initiating cell. Unfortunately, there is currently no reliable method to measure genotoxicity of vectors directly in transfected SCs. To address this deficiency, a specialized flow cytometry-based method was developed that quantitatively analyzed genotoxicity and determined the mechanism of mutagenesis that occurred in transfected SCs during the transfection process. The developed technique will enable scientists to design safer vectors for genetic modification of stem cells.

Indexed as

DNADNA DamageGenetic VectorsTransfectionHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMutagenesisNanostructuresDNAGene deliveryGenotoxicityMicronucleiNanoparticleStem cells

Identifiers

PMID29783088
PMCPMC6004338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.