Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29783026›Full record

ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2019

Prolonged and large outbreak of invasive group A Streptococcus disease within a nursing home: repeated intrafacility transmission of a single strain.

S A Nanduri, B J Metcalf, M A Arwady, C Edens, M A Lavin, J Morgan, W Clegg, A Beron, J P Albertson, R Link-Gelles and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The rise and spread of invasiveMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A Review ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Genomic Surveillance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

S A NanduriNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: yxj2@cdc.gov.
B J MetcalfNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
M A ArwadyChicago Department of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
C EdensEpidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
M A LavinLavin Consulting LLC, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J MorganIllinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL, USA.
W CleggChicago Department of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
A BeronIllinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL, USA.
J P AlbertsonIllinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL, USA.
R Link-GellesNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
A OgundimuNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J GoldNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of Mycotic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
D JacksonNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
S ChochuaNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
N StoneNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
C Van BenedenNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
K Fleming-DutraNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
B BeallNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMultiple invasive group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections were reported to public health by a skilled nursing facility (facility A) in Illinois between May 2014 and August 2016. Cases continued despite interventions including antibiotic prophylaxis for all residents and staff. Two other geographically close facilities reported contemporaneous outbreaks of GAS. We investigated potential reasons for ongoing transmission.

methodsWe obtained epidemiologic data from chart review of cases and review of facility and public health records from previous investigations into the outbreak. Infection control practices at facility A were observed and evaluated. Whole genome sequencing followed by phylogenetic analysis was performed on available isolates from the three facilities.

resultsFrom 2014 to 2016, 19 invasive and 60 noninvasive GAS infections were identified at facility A occurring in three clusters. Infection control evaluations during clusters 2 and 3 identified hand hygiene compliance rates of 14% to 25%, appropriate personal protective equipment use in only 33% of observed instances, and deficient wound-care practices. GAS isolates from residents and staff of all three facilities were subtype emm89.0; on phylogenetic analysis, facility A isolates were monophyletic and distinct.

conclusionsInadequate infection control and improper wound-care practices likely led to this 28-month-long outbreak of severe infections in a skilled nursing facility. Whole genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis suggested that intrafacility transmission of a single highly transmissible GAS strain was responsible for the outbreak in facility A. Integration of genomic epidemiology tools with traditional epidemiology and infection control assessments was helpful in investigation of a facility-wide outbreak.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksNursing HomesAgedComputational BiologyHumansInfection ControlPharyngitisPhylogenyStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus pyogenesUrinary Tract InfectionsWound InfectionGroup AIntrafacility transmissionInvasiveOutbreakSingle strainStreptococcal disease

Identifiers

PMID29783026
PMCPMC6500455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.