Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29782624›Full record

ArticleConditioning medicine2018

The underlying mechanisms involved in the protective effects of ischemic postconditioning.

Rong Xie, Jinquan Li, Heng Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conditioning medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rong XieDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jinquan LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Heng ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Huashan Hospital · CNStanford University · US

Funding

Protective mechanisms of ischemic postconditioningR01NS064136 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEINBERG, GARY K · 2010 to 2020
$3.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral ischemic postconditioning (PostC) refers to a series of brief ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) cycles applied at the onset of reperfusion following an ischemic event. PostC has been shown to have neuroprotective effects, and represents a promising clinical strategy against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Many studies have indicated that cerebral PostC can effectively reduce neural cell death, cerebral edema and infarct size, improve cerebral circulation, and relieve inflammation, apoptosis and oxidative stress. In addition, several protective molecular pathways such as Akt, mTOR and MAPK have been shown to play a role in PostC-induced neuroprotection. PostC represents an attractive therapeutic option because of its ability to be induced rapidly or in a delayed fashion, as well as being inducible by pharmacological agents. As a potential clinical treatment, PostC is therapeutically translatable as it can be induced remotely. The underlying mechanisms of PostC have been systematically investigated, but still need to be comprehensively analyzed. As most PostC studies to date were conducted preclinically using animal models, future studies are needed to optimize protocols in order to accelerate the clinical translation of PostC.

Indexed as

cerebral I/R injurymechanismmolecular pathwayneuro-protectionpostconditioning

Identifiers

PMID29782624
PMCPMC5959054
OpenAlexW2994249933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.