ArticleAnnals of plastic surgery2018
Comparing Processed Nerve Allografts and Assessing Their Capacity to Retain and Release Nerve Growth Factor.
Article in Annals of plastic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- End-to-side neurorrhaphy in the reconstruction of peripheral segmental neural loss: an experimental study.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2024Article
- Decellularization techniques and their applications for the repair and regeneration of the nervous system.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2020Review
- Repair of long segmental ulnar nerve defects in rats by several different kinds of nerve transposition.Neural regeneration research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peripheral nerve gap injuries continue to present a clinical challenge to today's surgeons. One method of surgical repair, implantation of acellular allografts, has been developed with the aim of bridging the gap with a cadaveric graft after removal of its cellular components, thereby accelerating axonal regeneration and eliminating the need for immunosuppression in recipient patients. Although decellularizing allografts reduces rates of graft rejection, the same chemical processing modifies the neural microenvironment, removing neutrotrophic factors and modifying the complex extracellular matrix. In this study, we explore 3 common methods for producing acellular allografts. Extracellular matrix content remaining after processing was investigated and was found to be highly dependent on the decellularization method. In addition, scanning electron micrographs were obtained to evaluate the structural effects of the decellularization methods. Though the content and structure of these processed allografts will contribute to their effectiveness as nerve gap repair candidates, we demonstrate that it also affects their capacity to be supplemented/preloaded with the prototypical neurotrophin, nerve growth factor (NGF), essential to neuronal regeneration. Although all allografts had some capacity for retaining NGF in the first 24 hours, only Sondell-processed grafts retained NGF over the entire experimental period of 21 days. Future studies will include validating these processed and supplemented allografts as viable alternatives to traditional autograft nerve gap repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.