Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29781695›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2018

Meeting report: 'How do I incorporate research into my family practice?': Reflections on experiences of and solutions for young family doctors.

Kenneth Yakubu, Maria C Colon-Gonzalez, Kyle Hoedebecke, Vasiliki Gkarmiri, Nagwa N Hegazy, Olugbemi O Popoola

Open access · goldAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Guiding the emerging primary care researcher: A report of research capacity-building workshop.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Kenneth YakubuDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Jos and Jos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria; AfriWon Renaissance, WONCA, Young Doctor Movement for Africa. danmasani1016@gmail.com.
Maria C Colon-Gonzalez
Kyle Hoedebecke
Vasiliki Gkarmiri
Nagwa N Hegazy
Olugbemi O Popoola
Federal Medical Centre · NGNational Health Service · GBThe University of Texas Rio Grande Valley · USUnifor · NOUniversity of Jos · NGWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily doctors (FDs) focus on biopsychosocial components of health during consultations. However, much of the evidence employed by these doctors is produced by researchers who are not routinely involved in family practice. Family doctors competent in both clinical practice and research are essential to addressing this gap. With the growing recognition of family medicine as the specialty of choice for many young doctors, there is a scarcity of literature that describes their experiences in combining research and daily family practice.

aimMembers from Young Doctor Movements (YDMs) under the auspices of the World Organisation of Family Doctors (WONCA) sought to address this knowledge gap by reflecting on their experiences towards becoming researchers. With the assistance of senior doctors, they explored solutions that can help young FDs incorporate research into their family practice.

methodsFollowing an online YDM meeting, a summary of the experiences of young FDs as well as strategies useful for incorporating research into their everyday practice as FDs was prepared.

resultNine thematic areas were derived, including experiences and motivation towards regular research, culture and environment of practice, relevance and gains of research, teamwork and mentorship.

conclusionFamily practices can incorporate research by promoting a personal and organisational research culture, highlighting gains and relevance of making it part of the profession and fostering teamwork, supportive networks and mentorship while making it enjoyable.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFamily PracticeAdultBiomedical ResearchClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleMentoringOrganizational CulturePhysicians, FamilyQualitative ResearchFamily practiceMentorsMotivationResearch

Identifiers

PMID29781695
PMCPMC5913785
OpenAlexW2796938872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.