Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29781585›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2018

Group I Paks support muscle regeneration and counteract cancer-associated muscle atrophy.

Andrea Cerquone Perpetuini, Andrea David Re Cecconi, Michela Chiappa, Giulia Benedetta Martinelli, Claudia Fuoco, Giovanni Desiderio, Luisa Castagnoli, Cesare Gargioli, Rosanna Piccirillo, Gianni Cesareni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The roles of P-selectin in cancer cachexia.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  5. Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in Cardiotoxin-Induced Muscle Injury Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea Cerquone PerpetuiniDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della ricerca scientifica, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Andrea David Re CecconiDepartment of Neurosciences, IRCCS-Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Via Giuseppe La Masa, 20156, Milan, Italy.
Michela ChiappaDepartment of Neurosciences, IRCCS-Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Via Giuseppe La Masa, 20156, Milan, Italy.
Giulia Benedetta MartinelliDepartment of Neurosciences, IRCCS-Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Via Giuseppe La Masa, 20156, Milan, Italy.
Claudia FuocoDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della ricerca scientifica, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni DesiderioDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della ricerca scientifica, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Luisa CastagnoliDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della ricerca scientifica, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Cesare GargioliDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della ricerca scientifica, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Rosanna PiccirilloDepartment of Neurosciences, IRCCS-Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Via Giuseppe La Masa, 20156, Milan, Italy.
Gianni CesareniDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della ricerca scientifica, 00133, Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · IT

Funding

European Research Council 322749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkeletal muscle is characterized by an efficient regeneration potential that is often impaired during myopathies. Understanding the molecular players involved in muscle homeostasis and regeneration could help to find new therapies against muscle degenerative disorders. Previous studies revealed that the Ser/Thr kinase p21 protein-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) was specifically down-regulated in the atrophying gastrocnemius of Yoshida hepatoma-bearing rats. In this study, we evaluated the role of group I Paks during cancer-related atrophy and muscle regeneration.

methodsWe examined Pak1 expression levels in the mouse Tibialis Anterior muscles during cancer cachexia induced by grafting colon adenocarcinoma C26 cells and in vitro by dexamethasone treatment. We investigated whether the overexpression of Pak1 counteracts muscle wasting in C26-bearing mice and in vitro also during interleukin-6 (IL6)-induced or dexamethasone-induced C2C12 atrophy. Moreover, we analysed the involvement of group I Paks on myogenic differentiation in vivo and in vitro using the group I chemical inhibitor IPA-3.

resultsWe found that Pak1 expression levels are reduced during cancer-induced cachexia in the Tibialis Anterior muscles of colon adenocarcinoma C26-bearing mice and in vitro during dexamethasone-induced myotube atrophy. Electroporation of muscles of C26-bearing mice with plasmids directing the synthesis of PAK1 preserves fiber size in cachectic muscles by restraining the expression of atrogin-1 and MuRF1 and possibly by inducing myogenin expression. Consistently, the overexpression of PAK1 reduces the dexamethasone-induced expression of MuRF1 in myotubes and increases the phospho-FOXO3/FOXO3 ratio. Interestingly, the ectopic expression of PAK1 counteracts atrophy in vitro by restraining the IL6-Stat3 signalling pathway measured in luciferase-based assays and by reducing rates of protein degradation in atrophying myotubes exposed to IL6. On the other hand, we observed that the inhibition of group I Paks has no effect on myotube atrophy in vitro and is associated with impaired muscle regeneration in vivo and in vitro. In fact, we found that mice treated with the group I inhibitor IPA-3 display a delayed recovery from cardiotoxin-induced muscle injury. This is consistent with in vitro experiments showing that IPA-3 impairs myogenin expression and myotube formation in vessel-associated myogenic progenitors, C2C12 myoblasts, and satellite cells. Finally, we observed that IPA-3 reduces p38α/β phosphorylation that is required to proceed through various stages of satellite cells differentiation: activation, asymmetric division, and ultimately myotube formation.

conclusionsOur data provide novel evidence that is consistent with group I Paks playing a central role in the regulation of muscle homeostasis, atrophy and myogenesis.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsCachexiaCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalGene ExpressionMaleMiceMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophyMyoblastsMyogeninCytokinesMyogeninp21-Activated Kinasesp38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesPak1 protein, mouseAtrophyCachexiaMusclePaksRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID29781585
PMCPMC6104114
OpenAlexW2803758345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.