Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29780878›Full record

ArticleAdvanced biosystems2018

Microfluidics in Malignant Glioma Research and Precision Medicine.

Meghan Logun, Wujun Zhao, Leidong Mao, Lohitash Karumbaiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced biosystems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The functional imperative in high-grade glioma.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Blood-Brain Barrier Breakdown in Neuroinflammation: Current In Vitro Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meghan LogunRegenerative Bioscience Center, ADS Complex, University of Georgia, 425 River Road, Athens, GA 30602-2771, USA.
Wujun ZhaoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2771, USA.
Leidong MaoSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2771, USA.
Lohitash KarumbaiahRegenerative Bioscience Center, ADS Complex, University of Georgia, 425 River Road, Athens, GA 30602-2771, USA.

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Creating Endogenous Stem Cell Niches to Promote Functional Brain Repair Post-TBIR01NS099596 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI KARUMBAIAH, LOHITASH · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
INTEGRATED FERROFLUIDIC MICROCHIP FOR CELL MANIPULATION AND ENRICHMENTR21GM104528 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI CHEN, JI, JANSEN, BEN H. · 2012 to 2014
$625k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM104528NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive form of brain cancer that has no effective treatments and a prognosis of only 12-15 months. Microfluidic technologies deliver microscale control of fluids and cells, and have aided cancer therapy as point-of-care devices for the diagnosis of breast and prostate cancers. However, a few microfluidic devices are developed to study malignant glioma. The ability of these platforms to accurately replicate the complex microenvironmental and extracellular conditions prevailing in the brain and facilitate the measurement of biological phenomena with high resolution and in a high-throughput manner could prove useful for studying glioma progression. These attributes, coupled with their relatively simple fabrication process, make them attractive for use as point-of-care diagnostic devices for detection and treatment of GBM. Here, the current issues that plague GBM research and treatment, as well as the current state of the art in glioma detection and therapy, are reviewed. Finally, opportunities are identified for implementing microfluidic technologies into research and diagnostics to facilitate the rapid detection and better therapeutic targeting of GBM.

Indexed as

glioblastomain vitro diagnostic devicesmicrofluidics

Identifiers

PMID29780878
PMCPMC5959050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.