Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29780775›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2018

Optimal cutoff level of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen to detect recurrent cervical squamous cell carcinoma during post-treatment surveillance.

Jinju Oh, Jin Young Bae

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. SPR biosensor with a graphene overlayer for carcinoma detection.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinju OhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea.
Jin Young BaeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9287-8210
Daegu Catholic University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the optimal cutoff level of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) to detect recurrent cervical squamous cell carcinoma during post-treatment surveillance.

methodsBetween January 2000 and July 2014, a total of 158 women with cervical squamous cell carcinoma were treated with radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy at our department. A total of 1,550 serum SCC-Ag tests performed during post-treatment surveillance of the 158 patients were included in this retrospective study.

resultsDuring post-treatment surveillance, 53 patients were diagnosed as having recurrent cervical cancer based on biopsy or a radiological test showing progression of a lesion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for serum SCC-Ag to diagnose recurrent cervical squamous cell carcinoma showed that the area under the ROC curve was 0.914 (95% confidence interval, 0.887-0.942;

conclusionSerum SCC-Ag test was helpful in detecting recurrent cervical squamous cell carcinoma during post-treatment surveillance, and the optimal cutoff value was ≥2 ng/mL. The researchers recommend active imaging studies, when serum SCC-Ag level ≥2 ng/mL during post-treatment surveillance.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerCutoffRecurrenceSquamous cell carcinoma antigenSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID29780775
PMCPMC5956116
OpenAlexW2799854317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.