Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29780620›Full record

ArticleEFORT open reviews2018

Day-case surgery for total hip and knee replacement: How safe and effective is it?

Stefan Lazic, Oliver Boughton, Catherine F Kellett, Deiary F Kader, Loïc Villet, Charles Rivière

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFORT open reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. No Effect of Surgical Approach on Discharge Outcomes in Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The safety and efficacy of day-case total joint arthroplasty.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan LazicSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, UK.
Oliver BoughtonMSK Lab, Imperial College London, UK.
Catherine F KellettSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, UK.
Deiary F KaderSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, UK.
Loïc VilletCentre de l'arthrose - Clinique du sport, Mérignac, France.
Charles RivièreSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, UK.
Epsom Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBClinique du Sport · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal protocols for pain control, blood loss management and thromboprophylaxis have been shown to benefit patients by being more effective and as safe (fewer iatrogenic complications) as conventional protocols.Proper patient selection and education, multimodal protocols and a well-defined clinical pathway are all key for successful day-case arthroplasty.By potentially being more effective, cheaper than and as safe as inpatient arthroplasty, day-case arthroplasty might be beneficial for patients and healthcare systems. Cite this article:

Indexed as

day case surgeryhip arthroplastyknee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID29780620
PMCPMC5941652
OpenAlexW2801411079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.