Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29780618›Full record

ArticleEFORT open reviews2018

Closed reduction of distal radius fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hjalte Søsborg-Würtz, Sükriye Corap Gellert, Julie Ladeby Erichsen, Bjarke Viberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFORT open reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hypertensive status redicts 30-day postoperative complications following open reduction internal fixation of distal radius fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Conservative management of distal radius fractures].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hjalte Søsborg-WürtzDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital.
Sükriye Corap GellertDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital of South West Jutland, Denmark.
Julie Ladeby ErichsenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital.
Bjarke VibergDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital.
Odense University Hospital · DKHospital South West Jutland · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distal radius fractures (DRF) are a common injury, especially in the elderly.Displaced fractures can be reduced by closed reduction through several techniques, two of which are compared in this systematic review and meta-analysis.Closed reduction by finger-trap traction (FTT) seems to offer better correction of radial shortening. Additionally, there may be less pain and fewer complications associated with this technique.Closed reduction by manual traction seems to offer better correction of the dorsal tilt.Further research is needed to fully determine the optimal method of closed reduction. Cite this article:

Indexed as

closed reductionconservative treatmentdistal radius fracturefinger-trap tractionmanual traction

Identifiers

PMID29780618
PMCPMC5941650
OpenAlexW2595337074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.