ArticleGastroenterology report2018
Screening for colorectal cancer in Tianhe, Guangzhou: results of combining fecal immunochemical tests and risk factors for selecting patients requiring colonoscopy.
Article in Gastroenterology report, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robust performance of a novel stool DNA test of methylated SDC2 for colorectal cancer detection: a multicenter clinical study.Clinical epigenetics · 2020Trial
- A qualitative interview study on colorectal cancer screening in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Age- and sex-stratified detection rates and associated factors of colorectal neoplasia in the Tianjin colorectal cancer screening program from 2012 to 2020.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Article
- Postponing colonoscopy for 6 months in high-risk population increases colorectal cancer detection in China.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Real-world application of a fast stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening in primary screening positive population.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Effects of Fecal Occult Blood Immunoassay Screening for Colorectal Cancer-Experience from a Hospital in Central Taiwan.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Factors associated with adherence to colonoscopy among individuals who were positive in the preliminary screening for colorectal neoplasms.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Factors associated with positive predictive value of preliminary screening in a two-step screening strategy for colorectal neoplasms in China.Discover oncology · 2022Article
- Choice of injection time of conscious sedation and its impact on pain control in colonoscopy.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Implementation and results of a gastrointestinal cancer screening program in an Amazon rainforest village: A descriptive study.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Clinicopathological and Prognostic Characteristics of RAD51 in Colorectal Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Article
- Improved diagnostic value by combining plasma PON1 level with tumor biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer patients.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- An early report of a screening program for colorectal cancer in Guangzhou, China.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- MicroRNA‑214 suppresses the viability, migration and invasion of human colorectal carcinoma cells via targeting transglutaminase 2.Molecular medicine reports · 2019Article
- Immunotherapy-based combination strategies for treatment of gastrointestinal cancers: current status and future prospects.Frontiers of medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the performance of a protocol combining fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and a high-risk factor questionnaire (HRFQ) for selecting patients requiring colonoscopy as part of a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in China.
methodsFrom 2015 to 2016, we conducted a CRC screening program for all residents aged 45 years or older in Tianhe District, Guangzhou City, China. Participants underwent an FIT and received an HRFQ as part of primary screening. Those with positive FIT and/or HRFQ results were considered to be at high risk and were recommended to undergo colonoscopy.
resultsA total of 10 074 subjects were recruited and enrolled in the screening program. In the enrolled population, 17.5% had positive FIT results and 19.4% had positive HRFQ results. Of those recommended to undergo diagnostic colonoscopy, 773 did so. The screening method's overall positive predictive value (PPV) was 4.9% for non-adenomatous polyps, 11.4% for low-risk adenomas (LRAs), 15.9% for high-risk adenomas (HRAs) and 1.6% for CRC. The PPVs of positive FIT results for non-adenomatous polyps, LRAs, HRAs and CRC were 5.2%, 15.9%, 22.5% and 2.5%, respectively. The PPVs of positive HRFQ results for non-adenomatous polyps, LRA, HRA and CRC were 4.1%, 10.2%, 14.3% and 1.4%, respectively. The PPVs associated with combined positive FIT and HRFQ results for non-adenomatous polyps, LRAs, HRAs and CRC were 4.5%, 16.4%, 23.7% and 2.8%, respectively.
conclusionOur results suggest that this two-step CRC screening strategy, involving a combination of FIT and HRFQ followed by colonoscopy, is useful to identify early-stage CRC. The high detection rates and PPVs for CRC and adenomas encourage this strategy's use in ongoing screening programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.