Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29780410›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2018

Quantification of Upper Limb Motor Recovery and EEG Power Changes after Robot-Assisted Bilateral Arm Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Marialuisa Gandolfi, Emanuela Formaggio, Christian Geroin, Silvia Francesca Storti, Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo, Marta Bortolami, Leopold Saltuari, Alessandro Picelli, Andreas Waldner, Paolo Manganotti and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marialuisa GandolfiNeuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0877-4807
Emanuela FormaggioSan Camillo Hospital IRCCS, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3417-0388
Christian GeroinNeuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Silvia Francesca StortiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8605-803X
Ilaria Boscolo GalazzoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4153-3749
Marta BortolamiNeuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Leopold SaltuariDepartment of Neurology, Hochzirl Hospital, 6170 Zirl, Austria.
Alessandro PicelliNeuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3558-8276
Andreas WaldnerResearch Unit for Neurorehabilitation South Tyrol, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7922-2380
Paolo ManganottiClinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital and Health Services of Trieste, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Nicola SmaniaNeuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7630-1887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bilateral arm training (BAT) has shown promise in expediting progress toward upper limb recovery in chronic stroke patients, but its neural correlates are poorly understood. Objective: To evaluate changes in upper limb function and EEG power after a robot-assisted BAT in chronic stroke patients. Methods: In a within-subject design, seven right-handed chronic stroke patients with upper limb paresis received 21 sessions (3 days/week) of the robot-assisted BAT. The outcomes were changes in score on the upper limb section of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FM), Motricity Index (MI), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) evaluated at the baseline (T Results: Significant improvement in all outcomes was measured over the course of the study. Changes in FM were significant at T Conclusions: A repetitive robotic-assisted BAT program may improve upper limb motor function and reduce spasticity in the chronically impaired paretic arm. Effects on spasticity were associated with EEG changes over the ipsilesional sensorimotor network.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionStroke RehabilitationAgedBrainChronic DiseaseElectroencephalographyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRoboticsStrokeTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID29780410
PMCPMC5892248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.