ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018
Comparative Metatranscriptomics of Wheat Rhizosphere Microbiomes in Disease Suppressive and Non-suppressive Soils for
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the antifungal activity of the wheat microbiome.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- High bacterial diversity drives the suppression of a soilborne plant disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Comparative metagenomic analysis of bacterial and fungal communities associated with bayoud-resistant and susceptible date palm cultivars in the Zagora oasis-Morocco.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Interpreting fungal ecological contributions through taxonomic and functional profiling of metatranscriptomics.IMA fungus · 2026Review
- Fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. from suppressive and conducive soils share genomic and functional traits relevant to Fusarium graminearum disease suppression.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Plant-pathogen interactions: making the case for multi-omics analysis of complex pathosystems.Stress biology · 2025Review
- Surface colonization bymBio · 2024Article
- Genome-resolved metatranscriptomics reveals conserved root colonization determinants in a synthetic microbiota.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Abundance, classification and genetic potential of Thaumarchaeota in metagenomes of European agricultural soils: a meta-analysis.Environmental microbiome · 2023Article
- Transitions of foliar mycobiota community and transcriptome in response to pathogenic conifer needle interactions.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Advancement of Metatranscriptomics towards Productive Agriculture and Sustainable Environment: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Delineation of mechanistic approaches of rhizosphere microorganisms facilitated plant health and resilience under challenging conditions.3 Biotech · 2022Review
- Synthetic microbial consortia derived from rhizosphere soil protect wheat against a soilborne fungal pathogen.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Do small RNAs unlock the below ground microbiome-plant interaction mystery?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Corrigendum: Wheat Microbiome: Structure, Dynamics, and Role in Improving Performance Under Stress Environments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- A simplified synthetic community rescues Astragalus mongholicus from root rot disease by activating plant-induced systemic resistance.Microbiome · 2021Article
- OMICs, Epigenetics, and Genome Editing Techniques for Food and Nutritional Security.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Defining the wheat microbiome: Towards microbiome-facilitated crop production.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Wheat Microbiome: Structure, Dynamics, and Role in Improving Performance Under Stress Environments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Indicators for assessment of soil quality: a mini-review.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The soilborne fungus
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.