Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29780268›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2018

Filling the BINs of life: Report of an amphibian and reptile survey of the Tanintharyi (Tenasserim) Region of Myanmar, with DNA barcode data.

Daniel G Mulcahy, Justin L Lee, Aryeh H Miller, Mia Chand, Myint Kyaw Thura, George R Zug

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. ZooKeys · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genetic diversity of the Pegu Rice Frog,Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  8. A new species ofPeerJ · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Counting stripes: revision of theZoological research · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A new species of Crocodile Newt, genusZoological research · 2019
    Article
  15. A new species ofPeerJ · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel G MulcahyGlobal Genome Initiative, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 10th & Constitution Ave., Washington, DC, 20013 USA.
Justin L LeeCollege of Computer, Mathematical and Natural Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park Maryland, 20742 USA.
Aryeh H MillerDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina Asheville, Asheville, NC 28804 USA.
Mia ChandCollege of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, 23187 USA.
Myint Kyaw ThuraMyanmar Environment Sustainable Conservation (MESC), Yangon, Myanmar.
George R ZugDepartment of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 20013 USA.
Smithsonian Institution · USBiodiversity and Nature Conservation Association · MMUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of North Carolina at Asheville · USWilliam & Mary · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite threats of species extinctions, taxonomic crises, and technological advances in genomics and natural history database informatics, we are still distant from cataloguing all of the species of life on earth. Amphibians and reptiles are no exceptions; in fact new species are described nearly every day and many species face possible extinction. The number of described species continues to climb as new areas of the world are explored and as species complexes are examined more thoroughly. The use of DNA barcoding provides a mechanism for rapidly estimating the number of species at a given site and has the potential to record all of the species of life on Earth. Though DNA barcoding has its caveats, it can be useful to estimate the number of species in a more systematic and efficient manner, to be followed in combination with more traditional, morphology-based identifications and species descriptions. Herein, we report the results of a voucher-based herpetological expedition to the Tanintharyi (Tenasserim) Region of Myanmar, enhanced with DNA barcode data. Our main surveys took place in the currently proposed Tanintharyi National Park. We combine our results with photographs and observational data from the Chaung-nauk-pyan forest reserve. Additionally, we provide the first checklist of amphibians and reptiles of the region, with species based on the literature and museum. Amphibians, anurans in particular, are one of the most poorly known groups of vertebrates in terms of taxonomy and the number of known species, particularly in Southeast Asia. Our rapid-assessment program combined with DNA barcoding and use of Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) of voucher specimens reveals the depth of taxonomic diversity in the southern Tanintharyi herpetofauna even though only a third of the potential amphibians and reptiles were seen. A total of 51 putative species (one caecilian, 25 frogs, 13 lizards, 10 snakes, and two turtles) were detected, several of which represent potentially undescribed species. Several of these species were detected by DNA barcode data alone. Furthermore, five species were recorded for the first time in Myanmar, two amphibians (Ichthyophis cf. kohtaoensis and

Indexed as

AnurabiodiversityGymnophionanatural historySoutheast Asiaspecies diversitySquamataTestudinesThailandThai-Malay Peninsula

Identifiers

PMID29780268
PMCPMC5958176
OpenAlexW2800383341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.