Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29780250›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2018

Partial stereotactic ablative boost radiotherapy in bulky non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

Yun Bai, Xian-Shu Gao, Shang-Bin Qin, Jia-Yan Chen, Meng-Meng Su, Qing Liu, Xiu-Bo Qin, Ming-Wei Ma, Bo Zhao, Xiao-Bin Gu and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Radiation treatment planning with embedded dose escalation.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yun BaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xian-Shu GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shang-Bin QinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jia-Yan ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Meng-Meng SuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qing LiuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiu-Bo QinDepartment of Medical Imaging, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ming-Wei MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bo ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Bin GuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Mu XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ming CuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin QiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Ying LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBulky non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is difficult to achieve effective local control by conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CRT). The present work aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of partial stereotactic ablative boost radiotherapy (P-SABR) in bulky NSCLC. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom December 2012 through August 2017, 30 patients with bulky NSCLC treated with P-SABR technique were analyzed. The P-SABR plan consisted of one partial SABR plan (5-9 Gy/f, 3-6 fractions) to gross tumor boost (GTVb), followed by one CRT plan to the planning target volume (PTV). GTVb was the max volume receiving SABR to guarantee the dose of organs-at-risks (OARs) falloff to about 3 Gy/f. The total dose of PTV margin was planned to above 60 Gy. The simply CRT plans were created using the same planning parameters as the original plan, with the goal to achieve comparable OARs doses and PTV margin dose to the P-SABR plan. Dosimetric variables were acquired in both P-SABR and compared CRT plans. Toxicity, local control, and survival were also evaluated.

resultsMedian follow-up in survivors was 10.3 months (range=2.3-39.4 months). Eleven patients (36.7%) had partial response (PR) and ten patients (33.3%) had stable disease (SD). Two-year overall survival was 55.6%. Two-year local control rate was 85.7%. No severe acute side effects >CTCAE Grade III were observed. Compared to the simply CRT plan, P-SABR plans achieved similar doses to the OARs and Dmin, but increased dose at the isocenter, Dmean, Dmax, and biological equivalent dose (BED) significantly (

conclusionThis retrospective study suggests that P-SABR is feasible and well tolerated in bulky NSCLC. Local control rate is encouraging, especially for the B90≥65% group, which may due to the ability of P-SABR to optimize BED with equivalent toxicity.

Indexed as

bulky massNSCLCP-SABRradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29780250
PMCPMC5951217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.