ArticleThe Egyptian journal of neurology, psychiatry and neurosurgery2018
Neurophysiologic tests screening cognitive impairment in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients.
Article in The Egyptian journal of neurology, psychiatry and neurosurgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A randomized sequential cross-over trial evaluating five purportedly ICP-lowering drugs in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Headache · 2025Trial
- Cognitive impairment in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A conceptual framework and therapeutic implications.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Cognıtıve functıons in idiopathic intracranial hypertensıon.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2024Article
- The Psychological and Cognitive Landscape of Adult Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Scoping Review.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2024Article
- Therapeutic Cerebral Fluid Puncture in Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: No Short-Term Effect on Neurocognitive Function.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a step change in understanding the disease mechanisms.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2023Review
- Cognitive Impairment in Primary and Secondary Headache Disorders.Current pain and headache reports · 2022Review
- Pressure-Volume Relationships in the Spinal Canal and Potential Neurological Complications After Epidural Fluid Injections.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Awareness, Diagnosis and Management of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Detecting Cognitive Impairment in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Using Ocular Motor and Neuropsychological Testing.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Cognitive performance in idiopathic intracranial hypertension and relevance of intracranial pressure.Brain communications · 2021Article
- Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension- The Eyes and Beyond.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
- Brain-based symptoms reported in young adults evaluated for cervical spine etiology: a retrospective, cross-sectional clinical study with preliminary data on over 200 patients.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a disorder with increased intracranial pressure of obscure cause. Patients with IIH may suffer from difficulty in thinking or concentrating. This work aimed at highlighting the neurophysiologic suggestions of cognitive impairment in IIH patients.
methodsTwenty patients with IIH-and a similar number of matched control subjects-were examined in this case-control study. The P300 and contingent negative variation (CNV) were performed. Results from both groups were compared.
resultsThere were significant lower means of P300 amplitude and CNV amplitude (early and late response) in patients than in controls. Also, there were significant delayed latencies of P300 and CNV in patients than in normal control subjects. Finally, P300 latency was correlated to mini-mental state examination.
conclusionsWe concluded that cognitive affection in IIH is well appreciated at neurophysiologic levels and is related to clinical inputs. We are providing a suggestion of the significant relation between clinical screening (i.e., mini-mental state examination) and NP screening (i.e., P300) of cognitive functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.