Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29780112›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2018

Lymph Node Metastasis of Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinoma after Curative Resection Using the Expanded Criteria for Early Gastric Cancer.

Tadashi Ochiai, Masaki Ominami, Yasuaki Nagami, Shusei Fukunaga, Takahiro Toyokawa, Hirokazu Yamagami, Tetsuya Tanigawa, Toshio Watanabe, Masaichi Ohira, Masahiko Ohsawa and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma with Rapid Progression.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tadashi OchiaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Masaki OminamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Yasuaki NagamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Shusei FukunagaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Takahiro ToyokawaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Hirokazu YamagamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Tetsuya TanigawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Toshio WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Masaichi OhiraDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Masahiko OhsawaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Yasuhiro FujiwaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Osaka City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of lesions using expanded indications for early gastric cancer (EGC) has been accepted as an alternative treatment for cases without lymph node metastasis. We herein report a rare case of metastatic lymph node tissue in mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) after curative ESD using the expanded pathological criteria. A 70-year-old man underwent ESD for two EGC lesions. A pathological examination revealed lesions that required curative resection based on the expanded pathological criteria of the Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. However, lymph node metastasis was detected at 26 months after ESD. Additional surgical resection was performed and MANEC was pathologically diagnosed in the metastatic lymph node. The patient subsequently underwent additional chemotherapy and remains alive at 2 years after surgery. Even though MANEC is a rare tumor, this case suggests that periodic follow-up is important when patients undergo curative resection by ESD based on the expanded indications because of the high malignant potential and the poor prognosis.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionAdenocarcinomaAgedEarly Detection of CancerGastric MucosaGastroscopyHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleStomach Neoplasmsendoscopic submucosal dissectionMANECneuroendocrinerecurrence

Identifiers

PMID29780112
PMCPMC6207817
OpenAlexW2803992082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.