Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29779844›Full record

ReviewConsciousness and cognition2018

Towards a unified perspective of object shape and motion processing in human dorsal cortex.

Gennady Erlikhman, Gideon P Caplovitz, Gennadiy Gurariy, Jared Medina, Jacqueline C Snow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Consciousness and cognition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Variability of dot spread is overestimated.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What Does Dorsal Cortex Contribute to Perception?Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2020
    Article
  15. Altered large-scale organization of shape processing in visual agnosia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gennady ErlikhmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA. Electronic address: gerlikhman@unr.edu.
Gideon P CaplovitzDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA.
Gennadiy GurariyDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Jared MedinaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, USA.
Jacqueline C SnowDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA.

Funding

Bringing the Real-World into Cognitive Neuroscience: From Images to Real ObjectsR01EY026701 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jacqueline C Walsh-Snow · 2016 to 2026
$3.3M
Neural correlates of spatiotemporal form intergationF32EY025520 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI ERLIKHMAN, GENNADY · 2015 to 2017
$164k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY025520NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although object-related areas were discovered in human parietal cortex a decade ago, surprisingly little is known about the nature and purpose of these representations, and how they differ from those in the ventral processing stream. In this article, we review evidence for the unique contribution of object areas of dorsal cortex to three-dimensional (3-D) shape representation, the localization of objects in space, and in guiding reaching and grasping actions. We also highlight the role of dorsal cortex in form-motion interaction and spatiotemporal integration, possible functional relationships between 3-D shape and motion processing, and how these processes operate together in the service of supporting goal-directed actions with objects. Fundamental differences between the nature of object representations in the dorsal versus ventral processing streams are considered, with an emphasis on how and why dorsal cortex supports veridical (rather than invariant) representations of objects to guide goal-directed hand actions in dynamic visual environments.

Indexed as

Form PerceptionHumansMotion PerceptionVisual CortexVisual Pathways3-D shapeActionDorsal streamGraspingObject perceptionReachingShape perceptionSpatiotemporal integration

Identifiers

PMID29779844
PMCPMC6433144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.