Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29779492›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2018

Pretreatment chest x-ray severity and its relation to bacterial burden in smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis.

S E Murthy, F Chatterjee, A Crook, R Dawson, C Mendel, M E Murphy, S R Murray, A J Nunn, P P J Phillips, Kasha P Singh and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Circulating antibody signatures againstFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PET/CT guided tuberculosis treatment shortening: a randomized trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

S E MurthyUCL Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Department of Infection, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. s.murthy@ucl.ac.uk.
F ChatterjeeDepartment of Radiology, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London, E1 1BB, UK.
A CrookMedical Research Council UK Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK.
R DawsonUniversity of Cape Town Lung Institute, George Street, Mowbray, Cape Town, South Africa.
C MendelGlobal Alliance for Tuberculosis Drug Development, New York, NY, 10005, USA.
M E MurphyUCL Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Department of Infection, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
S R MurrayGlobal Alliance for Tuberculosis Drug Development, New York, NY, 10005, USA.
A J NunnMedical Research Council UK Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK.
P P J PhillipsMedical Research Council UK Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK.
Kasha P SinghUCL Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Department of Infection, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
T D McHughUCL Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Department of Infection, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
S H GillespieMedical and Biological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9TF, UK. shg3@st-andrews.ac.uk.
REMoxTB Consortium

Funding

Leadership and Operations Center (LOC), AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG); LOC 1/UM1AI068636 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph J Eron, RAJESH T GANDHI · 2011 to 2026
$1073.1M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC), AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG)UM1AI068634 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Marlene Ann Cooper, Michael David Hughes · 2011 to 2026
$246.6M
Validation, CLIA and Qualification (VQC): Enhancing the RS ratio as a tool for AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) tuberculosis trialsUM1AI106701 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Grace M Aldrovandi · 2014 to 2026
$116.8M
University of KwaZulu-Natal - CAPRISA HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials UnitU01AI069469 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI ABDOOL KARIM, SALIM S · 2007 to 2011
$28.0M
Soweto Clinical Trials UnitU01AI069453 · NIAID · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI GRAY, GLENDA · 2007 to 2011
$25.5M
Durban International Clinical Trials UnitU01AI069426 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI LALLOO, UMESH G · 2007 to 2011
$11.2M
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1017459Medical Research Council MC_U122888469Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/27NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069426NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069453NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069469NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068634NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068636NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChest radiographs are used for diagnosis and severity assessment in tuberculosis (TB). The extent of disease as determined by smear grade and cavitation as a binary measure can predict 2-month smear results, but little has been done to determine whether radiological severity reflects the bacterial burden at diagnosis.

methodsPre-treatment chest x-rays from 1837 participants with smear-positive pulmonary TB enrolled into the REMoxTB trial (Gillespie et al., N Engl J Med 371:1577-87, 2014) were retrospectively reviewed. Two clinicians blinded to clinical details using the Ralph scoring system performed separate readings. An independent reader reviewed discrepant results for quality assessment and cavity presence. Cavitation presence was plotted against time to positivity (TTP) of sputum liquid cultures (MGIT 960). The Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed to calculate the difference in average TTP for these groups. The average lung field affected was compared to log

resultsFor 1354 participants, the median TTP was 117 h (4.88 days), being 26 h longer (95% CI 16-30, p < 0.001) in patients without cavitation compared to those with cavitation. The median percentage of lung-field affected was 18.1% (IQR 11.3-28.8%). For every 10-fold increase in TTP, the area of lung field affected decreased by 11.4%. Multivariable models showed that serum albumin decreased significantly as the percentage of lung field area increased in both those with and without cavitation. In addition, BMI and logged TTP had a small but significant effect in those with cavitation and the number of severe TB symptoms in the non-cavitation group also had a small effect, whilst other factors found to be significant on univariable analysis lost this effect in the model.

conclusionsThe radiological severity of disease on chest x-ray prior to treatment in smear positive pulmonary TB patients is weakly associated with the bacterial burden. When compared against other variables at diagnosis, this effect is lost in those without cavitation. Radiological severity does reflect the overall disease severity in smear positive pulmonary TB, but we suggest that clinicians should be cautious in over-interpreting the significance of radiological disease extent at diagnosis.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleThoracic WallTuberculosis, PulmonaryX-RaysYoung Adultcavitationchest x-raypretreatmentPulmonary tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID29779492
PMCPMC5961483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.