Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29779422›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society2020

Patient Portal Use Among Older Adults: What Is Really Happening Nationwide?

Eun-Shim Nahm, Shijun Zhu, Michele Bellantoni, Linda Keldsen, Kathleen Charters, Vince Russomanno, Matt Rietschel, HyoJin Son, Leslie Smith

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Effects of a Theory-Based Patient Portal e-Learning Program for Older Adults with Chronic Illnesses.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2019
    Trial
  4. Patient Portal Use Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Promises and Pitfalls of Health Information Technology for Home- and Community-Based Services.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eun-Shim NahmUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, USA.
Shijun ZhuUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, USA.
Michele BellantoniJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Linda KeldsenVA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, USA.
Kathleen ChartersUniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Vince RussomannoUniversity of Maryland Medical System, Linthicum, USA.
Matt RietschelUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, USA.
HyoJin SonUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, USA.
Leslie SmithSeniorNet, Fort Myers, FL, USA.

Funding

A Theory-Based Patient Portal eLearning Program for Older Adults with Chronic IllnessesR21HS024739 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI NAHM, EUN-SHIM · 2016 to 2017
$300k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS024739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient portals (PPs), secure websites that allow patients to access their electronic health records and other health tools, can benefit older adults managing chronic conditions. However, studies have shown a lack of PP use in older adults. Little is known about the way they use PPs in community settings and specific challenges they encounter. The aim of this study was to examine the current state of PP use in older adults, employing baseline data (quantitative and qualitative) from an ongoing nationwide online trial. The dataset includes 272 older adults (mean age, 70.0 years [50-92]) with chronic conditions. Findings showed that the majority of participants (71.3%) were using one or more PPs, but in limited ways. Their comments revealed practical difficulties with managing PPs, perceived benefits, and suggestions for improvement. Further studies with different older adult groups (e.g., clinic patients) will help develop and disseminate more usable PPs for these individuals.

Indexed as

AgedChronic DiseaseComputer LiteracyEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPatient PortalsSelf Efficacychronic illnessesolder adultspatient portalusability

Identifiers

PMID29779422
PMCPMC6707886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.