Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29779406›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery2018

Inhalation delivery of topotecan is superior to intravenous exposure for suppressing lung cancer in a preclinical model.

Philip J Kuehl, Marcie J Grimes, Devon Dubose, Michael Burke, David A Revelli, Andrew P Gigliotti, Steven A Belinsky, Mathewos Tessema

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A breath of fresh air: an updated review of nebulised tranexamic acid for post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Philip J Kuehla Lovelace Biomedical , Albuquerque , NM , USA.
Marcie J Grimesb Lung Cancer Program , Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute , Albuquerque , NM , USA.
Devon Dubosec Lonza-Bend Research Institute , Bend , OR , USA.
Michael Burkec Lonza-Bend Research Institute , Bend , OR , USA.
David A Revellia Lovelace Biomedical , Albuquerque , NM , USA.
Andrew P Gigliottia Lovelace Biomedical , Albuquerque , NM , USA.
Steven A Belinskyb Lung Cancer Program , Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute , Albuquerque , NM , USA.
Mathewos Tessemab Lung Cancer Program , Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute , Albuquerque , NM , USA.
Lovelace Medical Center · USLovelace Respiratory Research Institute · USLonza (United States) · US

Funding

WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
Aerosol Delivery of Topotecan for Personalized Lung Cancer TherapyR01CA193532 · NCI · LOVELACE BIOMEDICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KUEHL, PHILIP, TESSEMA, MATHEWOS · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA118100NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous (IV) topotecan is approved for the treatment of various malignancies including lung cancer but its clinical use is greatly undermined by severe hematopoietic toxicity. We hypothesized that inhalation delivery of topotecan would increase local exposure and efficacy against lung cancer while reducing systemic exposure and toxicity. These hypotheses were tested in a preclinical setting using a novel inhalable formulation of topotecan against the standard IV dose. Respirable dry-powder of topotecan was manufactured through spray-drying technology and the pharmacokinetics of 0.14 and 0.79 mg/kg inhalation doses were compared with 0.7 mg/kg IV dose. The efficacy of four weekly treatments with 1 mg/kg inhaled vs. 2 mg/kg IV topotecan were compared to untreated control using an established orthotopic lung cancer model for a fast (H1975) and moderately growing (A549) human lung tumors in the nude rat. Inhalation delivery increased topotecan exposure of lung tissue by approximately 30-fold, lung and plasma half-life by 5- and 4-folds, respectively, and reduced the maximum plasma concentration by 2-fold than the comparable IV dose. Inhaled topotecan improved the survival of rats with the fast-growing lung tumors from 7 to 80% and reduced the tumor burden of the moderately-growing lung tumors over 5- and 10-folds, respectively, than the 2-times higher IV topotecan and untreated control (p < .00001). These results indicate that inhalation delivery increases topotecan exposure of lung tissue and improves its efficacy against lung cancer while also lowering the effective dose and maximum systemic concentration that is responsible for its dose-limiting toxicity.

Indexed as

A549 CellsAdministration, InhalationAdministration, IntravenousAnimalsDry Powder InhalersHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMaleParticle SizePowdersRatsRats, NudeTopotecanPowdersTopotecanaerosoldry powderinhalationlung cancerTopotecan

Identifiers

PMID29779406
PMCPMC6058531
OpenAlexW2804063761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.