Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29779402›Full record

SynthesisIntegrative cancer therapies2018

Traditional and Complementary Medicine Use Among Indigenous Cancer Patients in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: A Systematic Review.

Alana Gall, Stuart Leske, Jon Adams, Veronica Matthews, Kate Anderson, Sheleigh Lawler, Gail Garvey

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Integrative cancer therapies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Colorectal Cancer in the American Indian and Alaska Native Community: A Holistic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. What is Indigenous cultural health and wellbeing? A narrative review.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Needs assessment of cancer survivors in Alaska.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Motivations for and Challenges in the Development of Global Medical Curricula: A Scoping Review.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alana Gall1 Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2503-2696
Stuart Leske1 Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4279-1053
Jon Adams2 University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9901-5717
Veronica Matthews3 University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1319-257X
Kate Anderson1 Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1214-2001
Sheleigh Lawler4 University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5771-0551
Gail Garvey1 Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5065-5716
Charles Darwin University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer 'patients' are increasingly using traditional indigenous and complementary medicines (T&CM) alongside conventional medical treatments to both cure and cope with their cancer diagnoses. To date T&CM use among Indigenous cancer patients from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States has not been systematically reviewed.

methodsWe systematically searched bibliographic databases to identify original research published between January 2000 and October 2017 regarding T&CM use by Indigenous cancer patients in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. Data from records meeting eligibility criteria were extracted and appraised for quality by 2 independent reviewers.

resultsTwenty-one journal articles from 18 studies across all 4 countries met our inclusion criteria. T&CM use ranged from 19% to 57.7% (differing across countries). T&CM was mostly used concurrently with conventional cancer treatments to meet their spiritual, emotional, social, and cultural needs; however, bush, traditional, and herbal medicines were used in a minority of cases as an alternative.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the importance of T&CM use to Indigenous cancer patients across these 4 countries; we identified multiple perceived spiritual, emotional and cultural benefits to its use. The patient's perception of their health professional's attitudes toward T&CM in some cases hindered or encouraged the patient's disclosure. Additional research is required to further explore the use and disclosure of T&CM among Indigenous cancer patients to help inform and ensure effective, safe, coordinated care for Indigenous cancer patients that relies on shared open decision making and communication across patients, communities, and providers.

Indexed as

AustraliaCanadaComplementary TherapiesHumansMedicine, TraditionalNew ZealandUnited StatesAmerican Native Continental Ancestry Groupcancercancer care facilitiescomplementary therapiesIndigenous populationneoplasmsOceanic Ancestry Grouptraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID29779402
PMCPMC6142081
OpenAlexW2804594850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.