Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29779145›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2018

Comprehensive genetic testing for female and male infertility using next-generation sequencing.

Bonny Patel, Sasha Parets, Matthew Akana, Gregory Kellogg, Michael Jansen, Chihyu Chang, Ying Cai, Rebecca Fox, Mohammad Niknazar, Roman Shraga and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Next-Generation Sequencing Infertility Panel in Turkey: First Results.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Genomic aspects in reproductive medicine.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Bonny PatelPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Sasha ParetsPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Matthew AkanaPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Gregory KelloggPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Michael JansenPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Chihyu ChangPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Ying CaiPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Rebecca FoxPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Mohammad NiknazarPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Roman ShragaPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Colby HunterPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Andrew PollockPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Robert WisotzkeyPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Malgorzata JaremkoPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Alex BisignanoPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
Oscar PuigPhosphorus, Inc., 1140 Broadway St, New York, NY, 10001, USA. oscar@phosphorus.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0918-2528

Funding

Phosphorus NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a comprehensive genetic test for female and male infertility in support of medical decisions during assisted reproductive technology (ART) protocols.

methodsWe developed a next-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panel consisting of 87 genes including promoters, 5' and 3' untranslated regions, exons, and selected introns. In addition, sex chromosome aneuploidies and Y chromosome microdeletions were analyzed concomitantly using the same panel.

resultsThe NGS panel was analytically validated by retrospective analysis of 118 genomic DNA samples with known variants in loci representative of female and male infertility. Our results showed analytical accuracy of > 99%, with > 98% sensitivity for single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and > 91% sensitivity for insertions/deletions (indels). Clinical sensitivity was assessed with samples containing variants representative of male and female infertility, and it was 100% for SNVs/indels, CFTR IVS8-5T variants, sex chromosome aneuploidies, and copy number variants (CNVs) and > 93% for Y chromosome microdeletions. Cost analysis shows potential savings when comparing this single NGS assay with the standard approach, which includes multiple assays.

conclusionsA single, comprehensive, NGS panel can simplify the ordering process for healthcare providers, reduce turnaround time, and lower the overall cost of testing for genetic assessment of infertility in females and males, while maintaining accuracy.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingDNA Copy Number VariationsExonsFemaleHumansINDEL MutationInfertility, FemaleInfertility, MaleMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideClinical genetic testingDiagnosticInfertilityNext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29779145
PMCPMC6086787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.