Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29779143›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2018

Health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis mapped against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Jana Le, Diana S Dorstyn, Elias Mpofu, Elise Prior, Phillip J Tully

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Do Determinants of Quality of Life Differ in Older People Living in the Community and Nursing Homes?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  18. Association of frailty with quality of life in older hypertensive adults: a cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jana LeSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Diana S DorstynSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. diana.dorstyn@adelaide.edu.au.
Elias MpofuDepartment of Rehabilitation and Health Services, University of North Texas, Denton, USA.
Elise PriorSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Phillip J TullySchool of Medicine, Freemasons Foundation Centre For Men's Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important outcome in coronary heart disease (CHD). However, variability in HRQoL indicators suggests a need to consider domain coverage. This review applies a globally accepted framework, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), to map HRQoL measures that are reliable and valid among people with CHD.

methodsThe Embase, Pubmed and PsycInfo databases were searched, with 10 observational studies comparing HRQOL among 4786 adults with CHD to 50949 controls identified. Study reporting quality was examined (QualSyst). Hedges' g statistic (with 95% CIs and p values) was used to measure the effect size for the difference between group means (≤ 0.2 small, ≤ 0.5 medium, ≤ 0.80 large difference), and between-study heterogeneity (tau, I

resultsAdults with CHD reported lowered HRQoL (g

conclusionsThe ICF provides a framework for evaluating and understanding the impact of CHD on HRQoL. The results demonstrate that HRQoL goes beyond physical symptoms, with activity limitations, social support and participation, and personal perceptions identified as key ICF domains in CHD assessment. Further investigations are needed to unravel the dynamic and inter-relationships between these domains, including longitudinal trends in HRQoL indicators.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseCoronary DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeAdultsChronic illnessDisabilityHeart disease

Identifiers

PMID29779143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.