ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018
Development of a Hemodynamic Model Using Routine Monitoring Parameters for Nociceptive Responses Evaluation During Surgery Under General Anesthesia.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Optimizing the timing of painless gastroscope insertion: integrating advanced monitoring tools to enhance safety and efficacy: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Associations between intraoperative nociceptive response index and early postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Article
- Age-related changes in intraoperative mean values of nociceptive response in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Article
- When nociception monitoring becomes predictive of surgical outcomes : has the future already become real ?Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Article
- [Nociception monitoring : Method for intraoperative opioid control?]Der Anaesthesist · 2021Review
- Association between intraoperative nociception and surgical invasiveness in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2021Article
- Association between intraoperative nociception and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Article
- Modified model for predicting early C-reactive protein levels after gastrointestinal surgery: A prospective cohort study.PloS one · 2020Article
- Effects of Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Nociceptive Levels After Skin Incision During Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Article
- Prediction of early C-reactive protein levels after non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia.PloS one · 2019Article
- Evaluation and correlation of nociceptive response index and spectral entropy indices as monitors of nociception in anesthetized patients.Journal of neurosciences in rural practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine hemodynamic monitoring parameters under general anesthesia, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and perfusion index (PI), do not solely reflect intraoperative nociceptive levels. We developed a hemodynamic model combining these 3 parameters for nociceptive responses during general anesthesia, and evaluated nociceptive responses to surgical skin incision. MATERIAL AND METHODS We first retrospectively performed discriminant analysis using 3 values - HR, SBP, and PI - to assess response to skin incision during tympanoplasty, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and open gastrectomy to determine if combined use of these parameters differentiates nociceptive levels among these 3 surgeries. Secondly, ordinal logistic regression analysis was applied using the 3 parameters to develop an equation representing nociceptive response during general anesthesia, and then evaluated its utility to discern nociceptive responses to skin incision. RESULTS We developed the following hemodynamic model as calculated nociceptive response= -1+2/(1+ exp(-0.01 HR -0.02 SBP +0.17 PI)), and prospectively determined that calculated nociceptive responses to small skin incision for laparoscopic surgery were significantly lower than responses to large skin incision for laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS Our hemodynamic model using HR, SBP, and PI likely reflects nociceptive levels at skin incision during general anesthesia, and quantitatively discerned the difference in nociceptive responses to skin incision between laparoscopy and laparotomy. This model could be applicable to assess either real-time nociceptive responses or averaged nociceptive responses throughout surgery without using special equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.