Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29778803›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of aging2018

Age affects reinforcement learning through dopamine-based learning imbalance and high decision noise-not through Parkinsonian mechanisms.

Ravi B Sojitra, Itamar Lerner, Jessica R Petok, Mark A Gluck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Intact reinforcement learning in healthy ageing.Experimental brain research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Adult Age and Functioning of the Locus Coeruleus Norepinephrinergic System on Reward-Based Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Age-related variability in decision-making: Insights from neurochemistry.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ravi B SojitraCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, Newark, NJ, USA; Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Rutgers University, Newark, Newark, NJ, USA. Electronic address: ravisoji@gmail.com.
Itamar LernerCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, Newark, NJ, USA. Electronic address: itamar.lerner@gmail.com.
Jessica R PetokCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, Newark, NJ, USA; Department of Psychology, St. Olaf-College, Northfield, MN, USA.
Mark A GluckCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, Newark, NJ, USA. Electronic address: gluck@newark.rutgers.edu.

Funding

Effect of genetics on reward learning and generalization of associations in agingR03AG044610 · NIA · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI GLUCK, MARK A, SIMON, JESSICA ROSE · 2014 to 2015
$153k
NIA NIH HHS R03 AG044610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probabilistic reinforcement learning declines in healthy cognitive aging. While some findings suggest impairments are especially conspicuous in learning from rewards, resembling deficits in Parkinson's disease, others also show impairments in learning from punishments. To reconcile these findings, we tested 252 adults from 3 age groups on a probabilistic reinforcement learning task, analyzed trial-by-trial performance with a Q-reinforcement learning model, and correlated both fitted model parameters and behavior to polymorphisms in dopamine-related genes. Analyses revealed that learning from both positive and negative feedback declines with age but through different mechanisms: when learning from negative feedback, older adults were slower due to noisy decision-making; when learning from positive feedback, they tended to settle for a nonoptimal solution due to an imbalance in learning from positive and negative prediction errors. The imbalance was associated with polymorphisms in the DARPP-32 gene and appeared to arise from mechanisms different from those previously attributed to Parkinson's disease. Moreover, this imbalance predicted previous findings on aging using the Probabilistic Selection Task, which were misattributed to Parkinsonian mechanisms.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBehaviorCognitive AgingDecision MakingDopamineDopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32Feedback, PhysiologicalFemaleHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedDopamineDopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32PPP1R1B protein, humanAgingDopamineParkinson's diseaseQ-learningReinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID29778803
PMCPMC5993631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.