Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29778761›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2018

Preferential stabilization of newly formed dendritic spines in motor cortex during manual skill learning predicts performance gains, but not memory endurance.

Taylor A Clark, Min Fu, Andrew K Dunn, Yi Zuo, Theresa A Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Synaptic modifications in learning and memory - A dendritic spine story.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. B cells migrate into remote brain areas and support neurogenesis and functional recovery after focal stroke in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taylor A ClarkInstitute for Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Electronic address: clark.taylorann@utexas.edu.
Min FuDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Andrew K DunnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Yi ZuoMolecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Theresa A JonesInstitute for Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Compensating for Brain DamageR01NS056839 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI JONES, THERESA A · 2007 to 2016
$3.3M
NEURAL MECHANISMS OF COMPENSATING FOR BRAIN DAMAGER37NS056839 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI JONES, THERESA A · 2018 to 2024
$2.6M
Neurovascular Mechanisms of Time-Dependencies in Stroke RehabilitationR01NS078791 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DUNN, ANDREW K, JONES, THERESA A · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS056839NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078791NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS056839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous findings that skill learning is associated with the formation and preferential stabilization of new dendritic spines in cortex have raised the possibility that this preferential stabilization is a mechanism for lasting skill memory. We investigated this possibility in adult mice using in vivo two-photon imaging to monitor spine dynamics on superficial apical dendrites of layer V pyramidal neurons in motor cortex during manual skill learning. Spine formation increased over the first 3 days of training on a skilled reaching task, followed by increased spine elimination. A greater proportion of spines formed during the first 3 training days were lost if training stopped after 3, compared with 15 days. However, performance gains achieved in 3 training days persisted, indicating that preferential new spine stabilization was non-essential for skill retention. Consistent with a role in ongoing skill refinement, the persistence of spines formed early in training strongly predicted performance improvements. Finally, while we observed no net spine density change on superficial dendrites, the density of spines on deeper apical branches of the same neuronal population was increased regardless of training duration, suggestive of a potential role in the retention of the initial skill memory. Together, these results indicate dendritic subpopulation-dependent variation in spine structural responses to skill learning, which potentially reflect distinct contributions to the refinement and retention of newly acquired motor skills.

Indexed as

Motor SkillsAnimalsDendritic SpinesMaleMemoryMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMotor CortexOptical ImagingDendritic subpopulationsIn vivo imagingMotor-skill learningSpine dynamics

Identifiers

PMID29778761
PMCPMC5995668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.