Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29778403›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2018

The CF-Sputum Induction Trial (CF-SpIT) to assess lower airway bacterial sampling in young children with cystic fibrosis: a prospective internally controlled interventional trial.

Katherine Ronchetti, Jo-Dee Tame, Christopher Paisey, Lena P Thia, Iolo Doull, Robin Howe, Eshwar Mahenthiralingam, Julian T Forton

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bronchiectasis in children: a systematic review of cytokine profile, immune cell phenotypes and microbiota in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Bronchoscopy-guided antimicrobial therapy for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. State-of-the-Art Review: Transformative Changes in the Care of People With Cystic Fibrosis: Implications for Infectious Diseases Specialists.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Review
  12. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Genome-wide association study of susceptibility toThe European respiratory journal · 2024
    Article
  17. Changing profile of bacterial infection and microbiome in cystic fibrosis: when to use antibiotics in the era of CFTR-modulator therapy.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  18. The ageing of people living with cystic fibrosis: what to expect now?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Cystic fibrosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine RonchettiDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK; Department of Paediatric Physiotherapy, Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Jo-Dee TameDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK; Department of Paediatric Physiotherapy, Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Christopher PaiseySchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, UK.
Lena P ThiaDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Iolo DoullDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Robin HoweDepartment of Microbiology, University Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Eshwar MahenthiralingamSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, UK.
Julian T FortonDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK; School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK. Electronic address: fortonjt@cardiff.ac.uk.
Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales · GBCardiff University · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathogen surveillance is challenging but crucial in children with cystic fibrosis-who are often non-productive of sputum even if actively coughing-because infection and lung disease begin early in life. The role of sputum induction as a diagnostic tool for infection has not previously been systematically addressed in young children with cystic fibrosis. We aimed to assess the pathogen yield from sputum induction compared with that from cough swab and single-lobe, two-lobe, and six-lobe bronchoalveolar lavage.

methodsThis prospective internally controlled interventional trial was done at the Children's Hospital for Wales (Cardiff, UK) in children with cystic fibrosis aged between 6 months and 18 years. Samples from cough swab, sputum induction, and single-lobe, two-lobe, and six-lobe bronchoalveolar lavage were matched for within-patient comparisons. Primary outcomes were comparative pathogen yield between sputum induction and cough swab for stage 1, and between sputum induction, and single-lobe, two-lobe, and six-lobe bronchoalveolar lavage for stage 2. Data were analysed as per protocol. This study is registered with the UK Clinical Research Network (14615) and with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Network Registry (12473810).

findingsBetween Jan 23, 2012, and July 4, 2017, 124 patients were prospectively recruited to the trial and had 200 sputum induction procedures for stage 1. 167 (84%) procedures were successful and the procedure was well tolerated. Of the 167 paired samples, 63 (38%) sputum-induction samples were pathogen positive compared with 24 (14%) cough swabs (p<0·0001; odds ratio [OR] 7·5; 95% CI 3·19-17·98). More pathogens were isolated from sputum induction than cough swab (79 [92%] of 86 vs 27 [31%] of 86; p<0·0001). For stage 2, 35 patients had a total of 41 paired sputum-induction and bronchoalveolar lavage procedures. Of the 41 paired samples, 28 (68%) were positive for at least one of the concurrent samples. 39 pathogens were isolated. Sputum induction identified 27 (69%) of the 39 pathogens, compared with 22 (56%; p=0·092; OR 3·3, 95% CI 0·91-12·11) on single-lobe, 28 (72%; p=1·0; OR 1·1, 95% CI 0·41-3·15) on two-lobe, and 33 (85%; p=0·21; OR 2·2, 95% CI 0·76-6·33) on six-lobe bronchoalveolar lavage.

interpretationSputum induction is superior to cough swab for pathogen detection, is effective at sampling the lower airway, and is a credible surrogate for bronchoalveolar lavage in symptomatic children. A substantial number of bronchoscopies could be avoided if sputum induction is done first and pathogens are appropriately treated. Both sputum induction and six-lobe bronchoalveolar lavage provide independent, sizeable gains in pathogen detection compared with the current gold-standard two-lobe bronchoalveolar lavage. We propose that sputum induction and six-lobe bronchoalveolar lavage combined are used as standard of care for comprehensive lower airway pathogen detection in children with cystic fibrosis.

fundingHealth and Care Research Wales-Academic Health Science Collaboration and Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund.

Indexed as

AdolescentBronchoalveolar LavageBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidChildChild, PreschoolCoughCystic FibrosisFemaleHumansInfantMaleProspective StudiesResearch DesignRespiratory SystemRespiratory Tract InfectionsSputum

Identifiers

PMID29778403
PMCPMC5971213
OpenAlexW2803635395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.