ArticleHearing research2018
Spatial hearing ability of the pigmented Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus): Minimum audible angle and spatial release from masking in azimuth.
Article in Hearing research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Presynaptic CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Spatial hearing and temporal processing ability of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) measured using prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle.Hearing research · 2026Article
- Interactions of Interaural Time and Level Differences in Spatial Hearing with Cochlear Implants.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Developmental auditory deprivation in one ear impairs brainstem binaural processing and reduces spatial hearing acuity.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Neural and behavioral binaural hearing impairment and its recovery following moderate noise exposure.Hearing research · 2025Article
- The neuronal and synaptic representations of spatial release from masking in the rat auditory cortex.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Interaural level difference sensitivity in neonatally deafened rats fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Updates to the guinea pig animal model for in-vivo auditory neuroscience in the low-frequency hearing range.Hearing research · 2022Article
- Spatial release from masking in crocodilians.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Animal models of hidden hearing loss: Does auditory-nerve-fiber loss cause real-world listening difficulties?Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2022Review
- Correlations between cochlear pathophysiology and behavioral measures of temporal and spatial processing in noise exposed macaques.Hearing research · 2021Article
- The mechanistic foundation of Weber's law.Nature neuroscience · 2019Article
- Characterization of Auditory and Binaural Spatial Hearing in a Fragile X Syndrome Mouse Model.eNeuroArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the common use of guinea pigs in investigations of the neural mechanisms of binaural and spatial hearing, their behavioral capabilities in spatial hearing tasks have surprisingly not been thoroughly investigated. To begin to fill this void, we tested the spatial hearing of adult male guinea pigs in several experiments using a paradigm based on the prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response. In the first experiment, we presented continuous broadband noise from one speaker location and switched to a second speaker location (the "prepulse") along the azimuth prior to presenting a brief, ∼110 dB SPL startle-eliciting stimulus. We found that the startle response amplitude was systematically reduced for larger changes in speaker swap angle (i.e., greater PPI), indicating that using the speaker "swap" paradigm is sufficient to assess stimulus detection of spatially separated sounds. In a second set of experiments, we swapped low- and high-pass noise across the midline to estimate their ability to utilize interaural time- and level-difference cues, respectively. The results reveal that guinea pigs can utilize both binaural cues to discriminate azimuthal sound sources. A third set of experiments examined spatial release from masking using a continuous broadband noise masker and a broadband chirp signal, both presented concurrently at various speaker locations. In general, animals displayed an increase in startle amplitude (i.e., lower PPI) when the masker was presented at speaker locations near that of the chirp signal, and reduced startle amplitudes (increased PPI) indicating lower detection thresholds when the noise was presented from more distant speaker locations. In summary, these results indicate that guinea pigs can: 1) discriminate changes in source location within a hemifield as well as across the midline, 2) discriminate sources of low- and high-pass sounds, demonstrating that they can effectively utilize both low-frequency interaural time and high-frequency level difference sound localization cues, and 3) utilize spatial release from masking to discriminate sound sources. This report confirms the guinea pig as a suitable spatial hearing model and reinforces prior estimates of guinea pig hearing ability from acoustical and physiological measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.