Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29778092›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2018

Magnetic resonance imaging for detecting root avulsions in traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries: protocol for a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy.

Ryckie G Wade, Yemisi Takwoingi, Justin C R Wormald, John P Ridgway, Steven Tanner, James J Rankine, Grainne Bourke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ryckie G WadeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK. ryckiewade@gmail.com.
Yemisi TakwoingiInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Justin C R WormaldDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK.
John P RidgwayLeeds Biomedical Research Centre, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Steven TannerLeeds Biomedical Research Centre, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.
James J RankineDepartment of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK.
Grainne BourkeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK.
Chapel Allerton Hospital · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBBuckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2018-11-ST2-028Department of Health PDF-2017-10-059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdult brachial plexus injuries (BPI) are becoming more common. The reconstruction and prognosis of pre-ganglionic injuries (root avulsions) are different to other types of BPI injury. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being used to identify root avulsions, but the evidence from studies of its diagnostic accuracy are conflicting. Therefore, a systematic review is needed to address uncertainty about the accuracy of MRI and to guide future research.

methodsWe will conduct a systematic search of electronic databases alongside reference tracking. We will include studies of adults with traumatic BPI which report the accuracy of preoperative MRI (index test) against surgical exploration of the roots of the brachial plexus (reference standard) for detecting either of the two target conditions (any root avulsion or any pseudomeningocoele as a surrogate marker of root avulsion). We will exclude case reports, articles considering bilateral injuries and studies where the number of true positives, false positives, false negatives and true negatives cannot be derived. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using a tailored version of the QUADAS-2 tool. Where possible, a bivariate model will be used for meta-analysis to obtain summary sensitivities and specificities for both target conditions. We will investigate heterogeneity in the performance of MRI according to field strength and the risk of bias if data permits. DISCUSSION: This review will summarise the current diagnostic accuracy of MRI for adult BPI, identify shortcomings and gaps in the literature and so help to guide future research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016049702 .

Indexed as

Predictive Value of TestsAdultBrachial PlexusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMeta-Analysis as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CareSensitivity and SpecificitySystematic Reviews as TopicBrachial plexusDiagnostic test accuracyMagnetic resonance imagingPre-ganglionicReviewRoot avulsionSensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID29778092
PMCPMC5960500
OpenAlexW2803848734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.