Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29778091›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

Health care provider experiences in primary care memory clinics: a phenomenological study.

Linda Sheiban, Paul Stolee, Carrie McAiney, Veronique Boscart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linda SheibanSchool of Public and Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Paul StoleeSchool of Public and Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. stolee@uwaterloo.ca.
Carrie McAineyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Veronique BoscartSchool of Public and Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
University of Waterloo · CAMcMaster University · CAResearch Institute for Aging · CA

Funding

CIHR ETG-92249 and ICTB-114392CIHR KTB-114392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing need for community-based services for persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Memory clinic (MC) teams in primary care settings have been established to provide care to people with ADRD. To consider wider adoption of these MC teams, insight is needed into the experiences of practitioners working in these models. The purpose of the current study is to explore the experiences of health care providers (HCPs) who work in primary care Memory Clinic (MC) teams to provide care to persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).

methodsThis study utilized a phenomenological methodology to explore experiences of 12 HCPs in two primary care MCs. Semi-structured interviews were completed with each HCP. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Colaizzi's steps for analyzing phenomenological data was utilized by the authors.

resultsThree themes emerged from the analysis to describe HCP experiences: supporting patients and family members during ADRD diagnosis and treatment, working in a team setting, and personal and professional rewards of caring for people with ADRD and their family members.

conclusionsFindings provide insight into current practices in primary care MCs and on the motivation of HCPs working with persons with ADRD.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelMemory DisordersPrimary Health CareAdultAlzheimer DiseaseAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMotivationProfessional CompetenceProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchAlzheimer’s diseaseDementiaGerontologyMemory clinicsPhenomenologyPrimary health careQualitative methodology

Identifiers

PMID29778091
PMCPMC5960498
OpenAlexW2806846351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.