ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2018
Study on immobilization of marine oil-degrading bacteria by carrier of algae materials.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioremediation perspectives and progress in petroleum pollution in the marine environment: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Review
- Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons UsingInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Systematic degradation mechanism and pathways analysis of the immobilized bacteria: Permeability and biodegradation, kinetic and molecular simulation.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the immobilizations with of bacteria two kinds of algal materials, Enteromorpha residue and kelp residue. The lipophilicity of them were compared by diesel absorption rates. The immobilization efficiency of Bacillus sp. E3 was measured to evaluate whether these carriers would satisfy the requirement for biodegradation of oil spills. The bacteria were immobilized through adsorption with the sterilized and non-sterilized carriers to compare the differences between the two treatments. Oil degradation rates were determined using gravimetric and GC-MS methods. Results showed the absorption rates of Enteromorpha residue and kelp residue for diesel were 411 and 273% respectively and remained approximately 105 and 120% after 2 h of erosion in simulated seawater system. After immobilized of Bacillus sp. E3, the oil degradation rates of them were higher than 65% after 21 days biodegradations. GC-MS analysis showed that two immobilizations degraded higher than 70% of the total alkane and the total PAHs, whereas the free bacteria degraded 63% of the total alkane and 66% the total PAHs. And the bacteria immobilized with the carriers degraded more HMW-alkanes and HMW-PAHs than the free bacteria. The bacteria immobilized by non-sterilized kelp residue showed a considerably higher degradation rate than that using sterilized kelp residue. A considerably higher cells absorption rate of immobilization was obtained when using kelp residue, and the preparation of immobilization was low cost and highly efficient. The experiments show the two algae materials, especially the kelp residue, present potential application in bioremediation of marine oil spills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29777442What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.