Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29777422›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2018

Patellofemoral Cartilage Repair.

Alexandre Barbieri Mestriner, Jakob Ackermann, Andreas H Gomoll

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Patellar cartilage repair-current concepts and evidence].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Systematic Review of Patient Outcomes and Associated Predictors After Microfracture in the Patellofemoral Joint.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre Barbieri MestrinerCartilage Repair Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 850 Boylston Street, Suite 120, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA. abmestriner@hotmail.com.
Jakob AckermannCartilage Repair Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 850 Boylston Street, Suite 120, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
Andreas H GomollCartilage Repair Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 850 Boylston Street, Suite 120, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USChestnut Hill College · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review provides an overview of well-established and newly developed cartilage repair techniques for cartilage defects in the patellofemoral joint (PFJ). An algorithm will be presented for approaching cartilage defects considering the distinct anatomy of both the patellar and trochlear articular surfaces. RECENT

findingsRecent studies on cartilage repair in the PFJ have demonstrated improved outcomes in an attempt to delay or obviate the need for arthroplasty, and improve symptoms in young patients. While autologous chondrocyte implantation shows good and excellent outcomes for chondral lesions, osteochondral defects are adequately addressed with osteochondral allograft transplantation. In case of patellar malalignment, concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy can significantly improve outcomes. Particulated cartilage and bone marrow aspirate concentrate are potential new alternative treatments for cartilage repair, currently in early clinical studies. Due to the frequency of concomitant anatomic abnormalities in the PFJ, a thorough clinical examination combined with careful indication for each procedure in each individual patient combined with meticulous surgical technique is central to achieve satisfying outcomes. Additional comparative studies of cartilage repair procedures, as well as investigation of newer techniques, are needed.

Indexed as

Autologous chondrocyte implantationCartilage repairChondral lesionOsteochondral allograftParticulated allograftPatellofemoral joint

Identifiers

PMID29777422
PMCPMC5970109
OpenAlexW2804578243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.