ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2018
Cardiac surgery 2017 reviewed.
Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive Effect of GDF-15 on Adverse Outcomes After Cardiovascular Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Renal function and coronary bypass surgery in patients with ischemic heart failure.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022Trial
- Determinants of the renal function after the coronary artery bypass grafting in chronic kidney disease patients: a prospective cohort study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Endo-Aortic Clamping with the IntraCludeJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Sternum-sparing multivessel coronary surgery as a routine procedure: Midterm results of total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy.JTCVS techniques · 2024Article
- Digital Health for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Five-year results of heart rate control with ivabradine or metoprolol succinate in patients after heart transplantation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022Article
- Mitral valve leaflet repair with the new PASCAL system: early real-world data from a German multicentre experience.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020Article
- Expert consensus document on the assessment of the severity of aortic valve stenosis by echocardiography to provide diagnostic conclusiveness by standardized verifiable documentation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020Review
- Cardiac surgery 2018 reviewed.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Review
- Hemodynamics of paradoxical severe aortic stenosis: insight from a pressure-volume loop analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Article
- Case report: panic attacks as symptom of aortic regurgitation and aneurysm.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For the year 2017, more than 21,000 published references can be found in PubMed when entering the search term "cardiac surgery". This review focusses on conventional cardiac surgery, considering the new interventional techniques only if they were directly compared to classic techniques but also entails aspects of perioperative intensive care management. The publications last year provided a plethora of new and interesting information that helped to quantify classic surgical treatment effects and provided new guidelines for the management of structural heart disease, which made comparisons to interventional techniques easier. The field of coronary bypass surgery was primarily filled with confirmatory evidence for the beneficial role of coronary artery bypass grafting for complex coronary disease and equal outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention for less complex disease including main stem lesions. For aortic valve treatment, the new guidelines provide an equal recommendation for surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement for high and intermediate risk giving specific check lists to individualize decision-making by the heart team. For low-risk aortic stenosis, surgical valve replacement remains the primary indication. For the mitral valve, the importance of surgical experience of the individual surgeon on short- and long-term outcome was presented and the prognostic impact of mitral repair for primary mitral regurgitation was emphasized. In addition, there were many relevant and interesting other contributions from the purely operative arena in the fields of tricuspid disease as well as terminal heart failure (i.e., transplantation and ventricular assist devices). While this article attempts to summarize the most pertinent publications, it does not have the expectation of being complete and cannot be free of individual interpretation. As in recent years, it provides a condensed summary that is intended to give the reader "solid ground" for up-to-date decision-making in cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29777372What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.